Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cush
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
481.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
It's interesting that Anjan compared the display tech to Pebble, because selling off the company instead of just the IP is where Pebble completely failed consumers. Pebble had something incredibly special, and then Fitbit bought Pebble
482.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
Some are comparing their display tech to Pebble, which was so threatening to the growing smartwatch market that Fitbit purchased the company and (for reasons I don't know) took all their IP and shelved it. I wonder if Daylight will be
483.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
The most expensive part of a device is the display. This is a bleeding-edge, first -generation, low-production-run display on top of an Android tablet. If it does what the demos show, it's the device I've been waiting a decade for
484.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
I feel like I’ve been using this tool for 20 years. So useful!
485.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
Yeah I thought it was broken on iOS too, then flipped the silent switch and it worked.
486.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
This is delightful! Thanks so much for sharing!
487.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
All these features look amazing! That car motion sickness feature especially. Can’t wait to try it!
488.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
I have the 4o model. On premium. No voice yet
489.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
Most people are competing against people on steroids. They’re incredibly common.
490.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
steroids
491.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
I tried the app and have a bit of feedback Since it’s designed to have people meet up, it’s important to require a photo. It’s a safety thing. This seems like it would be the first feature (what photo-swipe is to Tinder) but it would be nic
492.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
> What keeps Windows afloat? Gaming, enterprise, education, healthcare, manufacturing, etc etc. PCs are everywhere. You can run 40 year old software and they’re upgradable.
493.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
> Why is Tesla struggling? Every other manufacturer already has the customers, the employees, the manufacturing, supply chains, and they know the market better. Tesla is now a decade in to their Gen 1 and haven’t shipped anything because
494.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
Lawyer up? There is no way anyone at Pepsi would be stupid enough to sign an exclusivity agreement with Elon for a non-existent product. Even if they did sign some kind of contract, there’s nothing for Pepsi to nullify. If one party doesn’t
495.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
Don't worry, Hyperloop is just around the corner
496.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
Or never delivered at all. Expectations can change. As other EV manufacturers have surpassed Tesla on every front, consumer patience has worn thin.
497.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
> He's doing fine … Unfortunately, resources are naturally constrained His entire job is understanding those constraints and ensuring they don’t get in the way of creating an actual shipping product. When they do, he is not fine, he
498.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
The market still desperately needs engineers. We’re still at a point in supply/demand where experienced engineers are making 2-3x national median salaries. It’s tougher for juniors to land the most lucrative positions, but there are st
499.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
Agree. I was talking about const accountId = AccountId (“43525”) being less explicit
500.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
Does it though?
501.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
The DOM is bad and knowing browser quirks probably isn’t the thing I’d gatekeep a junior engineer about
502.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
At that point I'd just use a class constructor.
503.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
I personally prefer less code and more explicit casting
504.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
Wait, they weren't required to refund before...?
505.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
Ah, yeah the error makes sense. I expected the error, just wanted to understand how Brand was meant to be actually assigned to a primitive. I'm not sure the function is necessary though. This does the same thing const accountId =
506.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
Sorry, how do you apply it to branding primitives? The basic const accountId: Brand<string, "Account"> = "123654" Has the error Type 'string' is not assignable to type '{ readonly __Ac
507.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
Sorry, with the Symbol? How does it work?
508.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
Yes! I've wanted this in Typescript for ages! Is it possible to brand primitives though?
509.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
Ironically, Reddit just went down https://downdetector.com/status/reddit/
510.
▲
by
cush
2y ago
GDPR and CCPA
More ›