curtisblaine

45 ms·

871.
by curtisblaine 9y ago
> Nothing in the CoC says that it's a CoC violation to want to get rid of the CoC Wait, they just tried to expel a guy because he was subtly criticizing the CoC on twitter.
872.
by curtisblaine 9y ago
Also, a woman reopened an issue with a screenshot of what the TSC decided to redact. Such behaviour is unacceptable and should be subject to banning.
873.
by curtisblaine 9y ago
> If 4 of your 12 peers resign because you weren't removed, there is almost certainly some merit to these complaints. If 6 of them vote against removing the "accused" party, and 2 of them abstain, there's certainly li
874.
by curtisblaine 9y ago
Six of them voted for no sanctions, though. And two abstained. Who lost the vote resigned, which is a way to say "we couldn't expel you by voting, now we're trying to create as much drama as possible because we just can'
875.
by curtisblaine 9y ago
Which is a clause written on the CoC itself. The CoC must be respected because the CoC says so. Anyone who has doubts about the CoC, must be expelled from the TSC, because it's written on the CoC. This ensures that the CoC can't b
876.
by curtisblaine 9y ago
And yes, there are a lot of OS software projects that prospered without a CoC. Linux - coincidentally one of the most famous, successful and long-lived open source projects - is one of them. (And yes, now they have a CoC, which is not wha
877.
by curtisblaine 9y ago
"mass exodus" = exaggerated figure to create the impression of a crisis in an otherwise healthy community, in order to increase the drama.
878.
by curtisblaine 9y ago
Wait, he's a member of the Technical Steering Committee, which is a group "of key Collaborators who have demonstrated both technical expertise critical to the ongoing maintenance and evolution of the project and a long term commit
879.
by curtisblaine 9y ago
> Rvagg seemed to more of a doer than a talker So you mean he actually contributed to the code instead of inventing new ways to police what can be said on Twitter? What an horrible person.
880.
by curtisblaine 9y ago
So he dared to be in favour of anti-CoC article in one of his Twitter posts and thus unleashed the SJW brigade? What an heinous crime.
881.
by curtisblaine 9y ago
We shouldn't post articles from everipedia, though. Almost no peer review and aggressive tactics to "milk" controversial topics (just look at Mahbod's Facebook feed) = no credibility.