cubefox

5 ms·

31.
by cubefox 22d ago
Seems to be only available in certain countries.
32.
by cubefox 22d ago
> Indigenous? What the fuck are you talking about? Seriously? Why are you so happy to be racist in public? That's not an argument. Do you think it would be "racist" if Japanese people don't want to be largely replaced
33.
by cubefox 22d ago
Suggestion: Adding dates to your blog posts would be helpful. The first sentence mentioned "last year" and I was confused what that meant since the post was undated.
34.
by cubefox 22d ago
What are they called?
35.
by cubefox 23d ago
It is strongly misleading because it says "behind hacking scandals" (which suggests behind all of them in general) not "behind some of the hacking scandals". Considering that by far the most important one, the Hugging Fa
36.
by cubefox 23d ago
LCDs can get a lot brighter than OLED screens, which means the screen strobing (for reduction of persistence blur during eye movement) includes shorter light flashes, which means you get less visible persistence blur. That's why the Qu
37.
by cubefox 23d ago
It seems you haven't heard of the Hugging Face hack.
38.
Dan Selsam (OpenAI Researcher) Personal Statement on AI Risk(docs.google.com)
3 points by cubefox 24d ago|3 comments
39.
by cubefox 24d ago
It's not heavy, it's very light. I bet it's not hot either.
40.
by cubefox 24d ago
Thanks for vouching, it seems to have helped.
41.
by cubefox 24d ago
The latest post was published in mid March. I wonder whether the remaining three are still coming.
42.
by cubefox 24d ago
I posted a question but apparently it was sh dow b nned automatically by HN. Here it is again if anyone cares: https://sharetext.io/j3wjsivi
43.
by cubefox 24d ago
That's an embarrassing question, so no real need to answer it. But... men, ahem, like to imagine sometimes, well, naked ladies. As a substitute. When they don't have a partner and no pornography. But people with aphantasia can&#x2
44.
by cubefox 25d ago
Stone age peoples still existed until fairly recently in Africa and Australia, so stone age technology isn't prehistoric at all. What's prehistoric is stone age technology from other parts of the world.
45.
by cubefox 25d ago
Sure, but play is different from work.
46.
by cubefox 26d ago
> Any interruption or automation to what Im currently doing will just open the door to exploring new and different things. But that's the rub: At some point, possibly sooner than most people think, there won't be anything left
47.
by cubefox 26d ago
> Yet that journey is funded by society (esp. for domestic students) and society benefits from the results. The average person benefits when progress is made. Society doesn't benefit from results in research mathematics because it m
48.
by cubefox 26d ago
It's a graphical problem. Inverse kinematics is purely a graphical technique. It has no effect on gameplay. That doesn't mean it's irrelevant, except insofar graphical fidelity is irrelevant in general.
49.
by cubefox 26d ago
I was recently wondering why foot sliding is still a common problem in fighting games. Surely with Inverse Kinematics it should be possible to fix this problem by now. I have the suspicion that people who are accustomed to fighting games ar
50.
by cubefox 27d ago
Where is the difference?
51.
by cubefox 27d ago
Doing the last step of solving an open problem is the yard stick. But not for much longer: https://davidbessis.substack.com/p/the-fall-of-the-theorem-e...
52.
by cubefox 27d ago
> Dr. Tao said the same thing. Apparently he has since changed his mind.
53.
by cubefox 28d ago
> Surely some understanding of the lean proof is required, to make sure it proves what it claims to prove. Yes: > The only way the Lean proof could still be wrong is if the conjecture was formalized wrong via misleading definitions (i
54.
by cubefox 28d ago
So an LLM (or more realistically, a huge swarm of agents) should check his work, find a mistake or gap, or, if there is none, provide a formal verification.
55.
by cubefox 28d ago
> Not necessarily applied to OpenAI's solution to Navier-Stokes, but what happens if and when an AI genuinely appears to solve an extremely difficult problem but humans cannot independently verify the solution because understanding
56.
by cubefox 29d ago
It was just chosen earlier.
57.
by cubefox 29d ago
> So far all the foldables I've seen get destroyed quite fast. I doubt you did see any from the last few years.
58.
by cubefox 29d ago
They are addicted to teleprompters. Steve Jobs didn't use them.
59.
by cubefox 29d ago
I'm at a loss why anyone thought this asymmetrical design looks good.
60.
by cubefox 29d ago
What's your take on the aspect ratio question?

More ›