Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ctxc
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
91.
▲
by
ctxc
10mo ago
That's a pretty crazy background. I wish you'd put your profile in your bio so I could follow you!
92.
▲
by
ctxc
10mo ago
Do you have notifications set up or something? xD
93.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
I wish your contact details were in your profile, because I'm the kinda guy who'd annoy you till you finally give up and publish the blog ;)
94.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Hi! I'd like some quick feedback - I just implemented RSS on my blog. ie the URL works. Am I supposed to advertise it with the icon explicitly or is it enough if the URL works? What do you generally look for?
95.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Wow. A few questions: - I recently added RSS to my blog. The URL works but I don't advertise it with the icon. Should I? - What do you use to track traffic?
96.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
I do have a fairly new personal blog, but I'm not sure how discoverability works. It seems like you'd get traffic from search engines a few years back, but now the only traffic I've had is from a HN post. Everything points to
97.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
That's crazy. That's generally scapegoat-ing territory... I'd like to know more about the social network for the secret society though
98.
▲
Ask HN: Have you directly authored a high-profile massive bug? How does it feel?
3 points
by
ctxc
11mo ago
|
3 comments
99.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
That person's experience-gained knowledge is much more valuable than the literature you might get from LLMs.
100.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
How isn't this just fraud? Expectation is that sensitive meetings run through a pipeline without being exposed to actual people (and if it is for very specific reasons, there are audit trails). Here, they literally listen to sensitive
101.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Haha, I like this!
102.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
The best approach is to probably separate the number out I guess. Files deleted: {0 or 1 or 1,000,000}
103.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Haha, I understand. I actually agree with the sentiment in your first comment. These aren't what defines if a company is successful. A good experience, care and craftsmanship are important, but not company defining. I have decided
104.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Just checked your profile out. Turns out I've interacted with Umesh on LinkedIn before on Runnable. Small world. Nice work, all the best!
105.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
high fives ;)
106.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Open to suggestions to make it better!
107.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Touche ;)
108.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Ouch. Unfortunately I don't think I will. I'll probably always be hired by someone else to build a shared vision and aspire to do it as well as I possibly can :)
109.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Please don't get me started on Azure!
110.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Tests? What tests? ;) Seriously though, "Files deleted: {0 or 1 or 1000}" would also work :)
111.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Agreed! But I suspect several of these decisions are not intentionally made and are "...meh, whatever".
112.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Haha, interesting!
113.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Thank you, well said!
114.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Haha, one can dream! ;)
115.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
I'd be happy with "Files scanned: {0 or 1 or 100}" too ;)
116.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
"When I'm building something for my own use, I care about every aspect of it. I care about the unseen parts. I care about the process. It brings me satisfaction. And when I'm buying something, I like to know that the person w
117.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
"As of 2025, shame as a utility, is a weak tool" This is going on a t-shirt
118.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Haha trust me, I have thoughts on that too!
119.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
Said better than I could. Thank you!
120.
▲
by
ctxc
11mo ago
(author) I can assure you my intentions were much less sinister (and simpler ;))
More ›