csmpltn

6 ms·

31.
by csmpltn 8mo ago
Your family had to leave everything behind, risking a weeks-long journey at sea costing them everything they ever had, going into the unknown - at a time where nobody could travel. The US was not as rich, or built, or anything. People today
32.
by csmpltn 8mo ago
How does that negate my initial comment?
33.
by csmpltn 8mo ago
Like a pyramid scheme?
34.
by csmpltn 9mo ago
The tenant admin configures that mapping. They can also configure whether the data can be exposed to users outside of the organization. There’s no magic here.
35.
by csmpltn 9mo ago
The EU in a nutshell. It's never about achieving anything through actual work - it's all about the illusion of progress through buying domain names, custom fonts, padding: 200px, marketing, and more paperwork.
36.
by csmpltn 9mo ago
I'm not the one making unverifiable, extravagant, pompous and extraordinary claims though :)
37.
by csmpltn 9mo ago
So where’s all of this cutting edge amazing and flawless stuff you’ve built in a weekend that everybody else couldn’t because they were too dumb or slow or clueless?
38.
by csmpltn 9mo ago
It honestly starts to sound like they just botched the design and placement of these cables - placing them in shallow and exposed passages, with no proper defense against dragged anchors.
39.
by csmpltn 10mo ago
Getting a (cheap) dedicated device for banking purposes (perhaps without a sim card, wifi only) is a good way to «work around» this.
40.
by csmpltn 10mo ago
Are we green enough yet? Would’ve been nice to take the car instead of this, eh?
41.
by csmpltn 10mo ago
The goal is to intimidate criminals, and mitigate crime. What’s wrong with that?
42.
by csmpltn 10mo ago
But they still need to decode the proprietary DRM before it can be fed to the hardware decoder... lol
43.
by csmpltn 11mo ago
> "there's no way to set cpu affinity at least from userland" How is that even possible. What's the excuse? On Windows, setting process affinity has been around since the Windows NT days.
44.
by csmpltn 1y ago
Crimson Editor.
45.
by csmpltn 1y ago
This is the wrong take. There's a point beyond which LLMs are an overkill, where a simple script or a "classic" program can outdo the LLM across speed, accuracy, scalability, price and more. LLMs aren't supposed to solve
46.
by csmpltn 1y ago
Welcome to open source software, the "year of the linux desktop", etc...
47.
by csmpltn 1y ago
[flagged]
48.
by csmpltn 1y ago
"Shooting the messenger" (to quote you) is what happens when the messenger is an incompetent idiot, who fails miserably at their job and takes down the entire UN with them. Being a corrupt terrorist sympathizer who is funded by Ha
49.
by csmpltn 1y ago
Feel the vibe
50.
by csmpltn 1y ago
It is a good faith argument though. LLMs are trained on this exact kind of data - and a lot of times, chat frontends (Claude, ChatGPT, etc) will simply search the web and summarize the results for you...
51.
by csmpltn 1y ago
There are tens (if not hundreds) of thousands of OAuth libraries out there. Probably millions of relevant codebases on GitHub, Bitbucket, etc. Possibly millions of questions on StackOverflow, Reddit, Quora. Vast amounts of documentation acr
52.
by csmpltn 1y ago
> "Look through the parallel implementations, see which is best (even if it's not good enough), then figure out what changes to your prompt would have helped nudge towards the better solution." How can non-technical people
53.
by csmpltn 1y ago
That’s a lot. I don’t know the specifics of Lazarus, but this typically screams static linking with everything and the kitchen sink being thrown into this one binary. Entire cross-platform runtime, GUI assets, metadata, etc. Could be a fat
54.
by csmpltn 1y ago
This is cringey advertising, and shouldn't be on the frontpage.
55.
by csmpltn 2y ago
Google is winning because LLMs without a (good) search backend are mostly useless. So many LLM workloads require high quality search results (backed by efficient, relevant, complete and up-to-date indexes), and that’s Google’s muscle.
56.
by csmpltn 2y ago
There's "taxation", and then there is "taxation". VAT is an incredibly aggressive and overreaching version of "taxation", and it has severe implications on free trade with Europe. I'm not sure why you
57.
by csmpltn 2y ago
We started this conversation with you seemingly not understanding how VAT messes with free trade, and it sounds to me like you're in a different place now. Feel free to keep arguing over semantics all day long, I'll leave it at th
58.
by csmpltn 2y ago
I don't really care what you invest the money into, the point is that the VAT is a mechanism which messes with the concept of a free global market and it leads to unfair competition and an unleveled playing field. If you combine it wit
59.
by csmpltn 2y ago
Are you saying the VAT doesn't benefit Europe and European economies (both directly and indirectly)?
60.
by csmpltn 2y ago
US sales tax is *significantly* lower than VAT, varies by state (allowing for all kinds of loopholes), and applies to fewer categories of products and services sold. No point arguing this, VAT is a protectionist and anti-competitive tax an

More ›