csee

47 ms·

451.
by csee 5y ago
No, there is no misunderstanding. The paper has falsely defined wash trading to mean fake trades.
452.
by csee 5y ago
Every individualist I know, including myself since I consider myself one, believes that a state is necessary to resolve and mediate disputes between individuals. So I don't think this is a violation of individualism. Even Objectivists
453.
by csee 5y ago
Sure. Suppose there's 8 on the best bid and then you send a limit buy order of 1 quantity to the same price, making it 9 in total after your order arrives. Then after that, suppose a trade is shown with volume 9 at that price level. Wh
454.
by csee 5y ago
Extremely sceptical that the volume is fake in the largest exchanges. You can see it's real for yourself by putting an order in the book and simulating when it should be filled and compare that to the actual fill. You'll see that
455.
by csee 5y ago
And look at the reality of small tribes that put a spear through someone's leg for a social infraction. Large, modern and democratic institutions and the rule of law are a blessing.
456.
by csee 5y ago
I think the opposite is the case. The larger the population, the more infeasible central control becomes. Also, individualism doesn't support polluting commons. To the contrary, I have no moral right to pollute another individual'
457.
by csee 5y ago
I ignore and believe what makes sense based on the literature and a dose of common sense. Wear a mask, avoid large indoor gatherings, socially distance and ventilate are just obvious things to do for a respiratory virus and if the governmen
458.
by csee 5y ago
I don't share this view. They would have had a lot in common at a point in time in their history, but who's to say the consequences of millions of years of additional evolution post-energy abundance, let alone the consequences o
459.
by csee 5y ago
But could there be a class of games whose solutions are so complex that we can't understand them, yet an AGI would? We designed chess to be easily understood by humans. There's a cap on the conceptual complexity that fits within o
460.
by csee 5y ago
My opinion is that most wealth is attributable to the market, but the government is necessary to the extent that it sets and enforces the rules, resolves disputes, and provides defence. The government does help build wealth more directly (e
461.
by csee 5y ago
This covers positive freedoms, but what about negative freedoms? Contrast these two people: - The first person lives in a prosperous and authoritarian state. They have high positive freedoms (access to resources, healthcare, etc, thanks to
462.
by csee 5y ago
Some freedoms are trade-offs with other people's freedoms, e.g. freedom of movement vs freedom to not get covid. That's where your perspective fits. But other freedoms are more win-win or win-neutral situations and don't requ
463.
by csee 5y ago
Using ivermectin as a therapeutic and getting the vaccine are not mutually exclusive. Also, I don't like your first sentence, it's a rhetorical gotcha that is actually not in line with the medical establishment's thinking on
464.
by csee 5y ago
Again, stop saying "proof". You're misusing this word. It really seems like you have an ideological axe to grind. There is not "zero proof". Did you read the article? What you are saying and your level of confidence
465.
by csee 5y ago
Is it safe for the liver? A lot of nootropics substances that have positive effects can be pretty bad to the liver.
466.
by csee 5y ago
Or when you're walking and expecting a step to be there and it isn't.
467.
by csee 5y ago
"but certainly not what I would call neutral. The topic pits UAW versus Nonunion automakers." How is that not neutral? It's an unambiguous statement of fact that the tax credit is favoring unionized automakers over no
468.
by csee 5y ago
I said I don't fault people for using it as a precautionary therapeutic upon diagnosis. I didn't say that I don't fault people for taking it as a prophylactic. I do fault people for doing that because the side effects of long
469.
by csee 5y ago
"That's not a given" I never said it was a given. You're using another definition of the word "given" in order to argue. "You are in no position" Who said I was in a position to be maki
470.
by csee 5y ago
Don't use the word "proof". That's a word that's only appropriate in deductive disciplines like mathematics. Also let's accurately represent what the article is saying: "Again and again, more people are su
471.
by csee 5y ago
Why wait? Why not take ivermectin as a precautionary therapeutic given it is well tolerated with low risk of side effects? There's a chasm between the epistemic question of "does this drug really work?" and the pragmatic ques
472.
by csee 5y ago
While reading this piece I got a little depressed that most journalism is just such utter trash compared to it. I've read so many articles on ivermectin and none of them gave me even ten percent of the clarity that this article gave me
473.
by csee 5y ago
Don't subscribe again. You can read all these articles for free via archive. If they're going to be doing abusive things to you like that, you have a duty to pirate their content.
474.
by csee 5y ago
- Crypto - Unfortunately, even less local computing, with everything provisioned from the cloud under a SaaS payment model. - More mRNA applications - Power/energy networks and markets across borders. - Theranos, but legitimate. Better
475.
by csee 5y ago
I observed the local rate, correct. I didn't really make a claim that a large org would be exactly the same as my local rate, so I agree with you that it could differ. But honestly, I do believe it would be over 0.1 for most orgs, just
476.
by csee 5y ago
I knew the rate because I was on the ground working with the underperformers. But as to how to translate this into HR policy in a large org, I have no idea.
477.
by csee 5y ago
Depends how good your hiring is. At the places I've worked, I'd want to see 0.1 (involuntary) attrition at least, given that mishires happened 1 in 10 to 1 in 5 times. A low attrition rate in the context of lots of mishires means
478.
by csee 5y ago
Merely publishing public essays is an example of being willing to look stupid.
479.
by csee 5y ago
Realizing this is important for retention. It's damaging when upper management falsely thinks people are interchangeble, which is a common view among non-technical types and HR. This leads to 10x people feeling underappreciated and res
480.
by csee 5y ago
Jen Psaki said in a press conference that the executive branch is working with Facebook to take down posts containing "COVID misinformation".

More ›