Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cs702
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
52 ms
·
751.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
Thank you for that. It made me chuckle! Here are some counter-examples: * A new car company making a new kind of vehicle. The first time I heard he wanted to build a new car company that would sell EVs, I dismissed it as crazy. Tesla now se
752.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
WTF? This is utterly bananas. I don't get it. The long-term cost of treating longtime, loyal, talented employees like Rebecca Tinucci as... disposable could be very high. It could even threaten the company's survival. But... I
753.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
Wow, Rebecca Tinucci (EV charging) and Daniel Ho (EV products) are gone. WTF? This is utterly bananas. I don't get it. The long-term cost of treating longtime, loyal, talented employees as... disposable could be very high. It could eve
754.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
Original source: https://www.theinformation.com/articles/musk-plans-more-layo...
755.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
> I understand that's the context, but I'm not sure that it's unfair nitpicking. The OP is about much more than that, and taken as a whole, suggests the author is well aware that human beings absorb a lot more data from
756.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
I agree with you, but your comment strikes me as unfair nitpicking , because the OP is referring to information that has been encoded in words.
757.
▲
What Students Read Before They Protest
(nytimes.com)
4 points
by
cs702
2y ago
|
2 comments
758.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
> You can always represent removed state by additional state that represents deletion of whatever preceding state was there. Good point. Thank you!
759.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
No. RAG is about finding relevant documents/paragraphs (via KNN lookups of their embeddings) and then inserting those documents/paragraphs into the input context , as sequences of input tokens. What I'm talking about is diff
760.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
Maybe there was something on the water they drank as kids? (I'm joking, in case it's not obvious!)
761.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
This is exactly the sort of gem I love to find occasionally on HN. Done not for money, but, if I may paraphrase George Mallory, because the challenge was there. Someone had to do it.
762.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
Wow. The same Gary Kildall who was first approached by IBM for a PC operating system[a] helped write Pixar's first 3-D renderer. At a minimum, Kildall's Wikipedia page should be updated with his contribution to Pixar! --- [a] Bill
763.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
The OP is not trying to answer the question. Rather, the OP is asking the question and sharing some thoughts on the motivations for asking it.
764.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
...by Cory Doctorov. If you've read anything by him before, you will already have a sense of what he writes in this opinion piece. As always, he's very much in favor of unionization by tech workers, including engineers.
765.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
Thank you for sharing this here. Rigorous work on the "expressibility" of current LLMs (i.e., which classes of problems can they tackle?) is surely more important , but I suspect it will go over head of most HN readers, many of w
766.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
As an aside, at one point I experimented a little with transformers that had access to external memory searchable via KNN lookups https://github.com/lucidrains/memorizing-transformers-pytorc... ( great work by lucidra
767.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
Fantastic essay. Highly recommended! I agree with all key points: * There are problems that are easy for human beings but hard for current LLMs (and maybe impossible for them; no one knows). Examples include playing Wordle and predicting
768.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
> Perhaps by having a dataset of symbols that corresponds to symbols that you similarly understand how they can be put together, as well by having a model for how to respond to inputs given some prompts. That's the same as saying th
769.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
For a machine to be able to say "what you want to hear," it must understand what you're talking about, internally, in some fashion. How else could it do that ? As Hans Moravec wrote in 1998, when he predicted intelligent m
770.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
I disagree with the authors's key claims: 1. They claim that "an LLM does not understand the semantic meaning of a sentence in a linguistic sense, but rather calculates mathematically what the most likely next word should be based
771.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
The key facts, for me: > Since it was first identified, the H5 strain of avian influenza and its variants have led to the slaughter of over half a billion farmed birds. Wild-bird deaths are estimated in the millions, with around 600,000
772.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
I've tried this for Wordnet hierarchical classification with a Standard Cross Entropy loss: https://github.com/glassroom/heinsen_tree#sample-usage-with-... It worked for me, but I had to modify the code to use all
773.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
TL;DR: The authors pretrain the model to classify images into Wordnet synsets[a] that appear in the caption, using a standard Cross Entropy loss. They keep the number of classes relatively small by removing any synsets that don't show
774.
▲
by
cs702
2y ago
Thanks. Yes, you're right, sometimes "treadmill" is used pejoratively to describe forced upgrades that otherwise would be unnecessary. I was referring to the fact that we are all voluntarily installing security updates an
775.
▲
by
cs702
3y ago
Good point! I'll edit my comment.
776.
▲
by
cs702
3y ago
Sorry, I don't understand your question. By "treadmill" I mean sticking to a particular distro year after year, upgrading regularly -- it could be Ubuntu, Debian, Red Hat, CentOS, etc. Unless you're constantly switching
777.
▲
by
cs702
3y ago
Looks like a no-brainer if you're on the Ubuntu treadmill. Key differences versus the previous LTS version: * Distribution packages built with additional security-hardening features * Linux Kernel 6.8 * Gnome 46 * Updated utils and app
778.
▲
by
cs702
3y ago
> an exercise of pure marketing Yes. Great choice of words. A lot of non -frontier models look like "an exercise of pure marketing" to me. Still, I fail to see the rationale for telling the world, "Look at us! We can
779.
▲
by
cs702
3y ago
> "build something fast, get users, engagement, and venture capital, hope you can grow fast enough to still be around after the Great AI cull" Snowflake is a publicly traded company with a market cap of $50B and $4B of cash i
780.
▲
by
cs702
3y ago
You're right. I changed it. Thanks!
More ›