cryptarch

39 ms·

451.
by cryptarch 10y ago
*supposedly
452.
by cryptarch 10y ago
Did you mean "intents and purposes" or did some wordplay go over my head?
453.
by cryptarch 10y ago
They sure are bound by the amount of information you give them. On Facebook they tend to have your picture, full legal name, social circles, place of work and where you live from the start. I know plenty of people who use online markets pse
454.
by cryptarch 10y ago
How about the FSF suing Microsoft for copyright infringement? That would be a fun one. Every individual contributor could also potentially sue Microsoft in that case. The FSF wouldn't even have to lift a finger, and the contributors co
455.
by cryptarch 10y ago
I don't believe it's unreasonable to expect your computer to boot reliably and in a known amount of time. How long do you think it would take for people to abandon a Linux distribution if it started auto-updating and locking peopl
456.
by cryptarch 10y ago
I'm having trouble finding the source code, am I the only one? I wonder what a mental illness compiler would look like. Would every user have to interact with a ML system to derive their own opcodes? Could it be used both for curing an
457.
by cryptarch 10y ago
Could individual miners change the cost they charge for individual opcodes, or perhaps even disable specific opcodes alltogether?
458.
by cryptarch 10y ago
Is it possible to know when particles were prematurely untangled? Wouldn't that constitute transmitting information? How would you tell the difference between a set of qbits entangled with the right other set of qbits, and with a diffe
459.
by cryptarch 10y ago
But if you have a secure way of getting your quantum bits to Bob, couldn't you get your OTP there in the same way? I mean, yes, you could detect it if your stream of entangled bits is intercepted while it is going, but you couldn'
460.
by cryptarch 10y ago
I don't think I understand it right. My understanding is this: 1. send entangled bits to two separate locations A and B 2. determine their states (which will always be exactly opposite) on both sides 3. send data using classical means
461.
by cryptarch 10y ago
It is copyright infringement and piracy; they had no right to redistribute this code, even if they had kept the copyright notice. Aside from that, I do think it is theft in the sense that AJ is using bandwidth not paid for by them.
462.
by cryptarch 10y ago
Does this decision mean it's now required to have a captive portal on my open hotspot at home, or does this decision only pertain to commercial enterprises? It sounds like the latter, but the idea that I might soon be required to set u
463.
by cryptarch 10y ago
I can't edit my post anymore, but I couldn't find a source to back this up. According to the Tor Blog, it should be fine to have a reduced exit policy. For reference: https://blog.torproject.org/running-exit-node
464.
by cryptarch 10y ago
I was under the impression that this was a dangerous thing to do, because by using custom filtering you implicitly accept responsibility for what illegal content slips through your filter.
465.
by cryptarch 10y ago
I think it's tweaked periodically, and unpublished to make manipulation harder.
466.
by cryptarch 10y ago
Two sides of the same coin? a.) Immigrants out of prison are bad, because they do work for minimum wage or more. b.) Immigrants in prison are good, because they do work for less then minimum wage.
467.
by cryptarch 10y ago
Would you happen to have an up-to-date guide? The one you linked doesn't work in a fresh Win10 Home VM.
468.
by cryptarch 10y ago
If you don't care about security and don't mind missing out on HTTPS-Everywhere users.
469.
by cryptarch 10y ago
You use a GUID or counter as a user ID, and add a username field which resolves to this ID? You would then have to enforce username uniqueness when assigning/renaming usernames.
470.
by cryptarch 10y ago
Is this meant to make uninstalling Steam easier than it is now? Or is this an exercise in getting GUI applications with slightly exotic features (GPU access) to run? I'd like to understand why this was made but it isn't described
471.
by cryptarch 10y ago
And I think a site's ToS could potentially forbid this and thus provide an avenue to sue either you, Brave or both. Aside from that, I don't think the "my device, my choice" adblock arguments go here. I think it's p
472.
by cryptarch 10y ago
You can even configure this remotely, assuming you have at least one user in the sudoers group.
473.
by cryptarch 10y ago
I think it's meant to defend against collisions that don't produce the actual password, but some other value which hashes to the correct value.