cryo32

13 ms·

331.
by cryo32 5mo ago
It has. Some utter morons seem to run everything they receive and send through it at work. I have a spreadsheet now of people I can't be fucked with.
332.
by cryo32 5mo ago
What's your time and life worth? You pay Apple to deal with it (which I do) and get to live a peaceful life and go out and take photos and have experiences. Or do you spend weeks implementing your own solution with Claude. The latter i
333.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Yeah so don't bother. I don't write code at home. What's the point? I go on holiday once a month!
334.
by cryo32 5mo ago
It shouldn't be used for that either. The problem is our programming languages and tools are shit so we made another expensive tool to drive them. I've said this elsewhere before but I single-handedly produced more actual tangible
335.
by cryo32 5mo ago
It's not nostalgia. It's self-awareness and importantly self-worth.
336.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Leisure projects for me at least are about the personal challenge and achievement. If the LLM does it, you achieved nothing.
337.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Exactly this. I’m forever getting asked for help by people who suddenly value the human experience when their machine god fails them. Sometimes fuck ‘em because they devalued me first.
338.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Well it seems to be slowly including a lot of NT features. Fibers, message bus, the logging system, service management. I’m starting to think NT got it right.
339.
by cryo32 5mo ago
systemd is turning into Windows NT.
340.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Well the problem is not a lot. It's pretty much like being in 2009 still. Which is fine if you didn't adopt a huge amount of technology changes since. I mean I quite like the todo list that comes with my phone and computer and syn
341.
by cryo32 5mo ago
I am wondering if she only does 10 minutes of work a day :)
342.
by cryo32 5mo ago
You think an investor gives a shit past "if they say this, the numbers will go up"? And the numbers mostly go up because everyone has the same mentality. No one cares about the product any more. And that will be the end of all of
343.
by cryo32 5mo ago
As a member of the user community, I only care when it appears on the security list and then that it's patched. And I want to see that on the changelog. And that's about it. I don't want or need fanfare, marketing or any of t
344.
by cryo32 5mo ago
You're not going to get anywhere in the security sector unless you gain notoriety i.e. are noticed. This appears to come from dressing up like Elton John in a feather suit and hiring a marketing team.
345.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Dear customers, we regret to inform you that the existing hallucinations now include biased trash.
346.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Think the AI bros are downvoting you here but I agree entirely with this perspective.
347.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Wise comment. 25 years working in PE showed me that retail investors are how you pay off losses.
348.
by cryo32 5mo ago
I think this is just the default endgame of large corporates which suck up large quantities of customers. They are a race to the bottom and you end up with service by footgun. My own company is responsible for doing this in our sector. Lite
349.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Anyone who has read Careless People will not be surprised at this. Meta is a scourge.
350.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Good. Why wouldn't you boo at a net loss for your own personal security?
351.
by cryo32 5mo ago
It's worse. Vague requirements still only power vague interpretations of the problem. Even if you provide good requirements, you still only have vague interpretations at your fingertips. The promise is that such things won't be a
352.
by cryo32 5mo ago
They aren't being sold at a loss but they aren't being sold at enough to cover the current losses and the costs. The losses are being passed around in some fucked up circular funding mess which will inevitably collapse into a debt
353.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Probably the massive hangover I have. Sorry.
354.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Well true but wait until you do something else and they pile that on top of it.
355.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Oh definitely. There's two sides to the coin always.
356.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Their job is also to secure national infrastructure. Compromising that through policy would do more damage.
357.
by cryo32 5mo ago
The technology bit doesn't really matter though. The real problem is that the legislation would bring the power to prosecute people who use them or use it against them. The security services aren't having any of that shit becaus
358.
by cryo32 5mo ago
I have seen some of the inside of this and it's not quite as clear cut. One side of this is driven by a bunch of not too reputable think tanks behind the scenes who persuaded a couple of fringe academics to agree with them and push for
359.
by cryo32 5mo ago
I wasn’t aware fascism was defined by a body count.
360.
by cryo32 5mo ago
Bollocks it is. It’s not public and serviced by tech companies.

More ›