crudbug

26 ms·

1. 271.▲
   by crudbug 11y ago

   I agree, dev team could have shown some creativity in naming the project. As Knuth says, naming matters a lot.
2. 272.▲
   by crudbug 11y ago

   Putting resources behind dropwizard would have been a better approach. Dropwizard needs some love on the admin/ops UI sides.
3. 273.▲
   by crudbug 11y ago

   I would rather make TS to JVM & CLR Bytecode, to have a unified ecosystem from the opposite side.
4. 274.▲
   by crudbug 11y ago

   I would also like to see a discussion on this topic. Folks with H1B, who wants to start 1. What is required, if the current company allows Moonlighting ? 2. If the second job is not allowed ?
5. 275.▲
   by crudbug 11y ago

   All the best to Influx team. I see a good platform strategy here.
6. 276.▲
   by crudbug 11y ago

   Zuck - If you are here .. Buy Yahoo for Max, Trust me, you will thank me later. :)
7. 277.▲
   by crudbug 11y ago

   True ! This makes the argument event better :)
8. 278.▲
   by crudbug 11y ago

   Yahoo management lacks vision. They had the most popular brand names in social media space, still couldn't innovate. 1. Messenger 2. Mail 3. Flickr 4. Tumblr
9. 279.▲
   by crudbug 11y ago

   +1
10. 280.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    Point well received. BTW Fat arrow looks more appealing than simple arrow. All the other pieces look very well designed.
11. 281.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    The functional mapping also makes sense. Thanks for the pointer.
12. 282.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    I was thinking more about Types here var name : String func nameMe(name: String) : String
13. 283.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    Thanks for the link. I think, the function type : (Int, Int) -> Int may have been the main reason, but having (Int, Int) : Int func nameMe(name: String, calName: ((Int, Int) : Int)) would still have worked, and made the syntax more aesth
14. 284.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    What was the design decision that required function declaration to be : func hello(name: String) -> String { } rather than, func hello(name: String) : String { }
15. 285.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    I use selfcontrol [1] everyday for this. [1] https://selfcontrolapp.com
16. 286.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    Thanks for the Blazegraph link.
17. 287.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    Read my mind !
18. 288.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    I have been playing with JVM Actor. Kontractor API design is elegant. Others frameworks for JVM are Orbit [1], Quasar [2] & akka [3]. [1] http://orbit.bioware.com [2] http://docs.paralleluniverse.co/quasar&#x
19. 289.▲
    JVM Actors – Kontractor(ruedigermoeller.github.io)

    3 points by crudbug 11y ago|1 comments
20. 290.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    A better approach from JVM to Web platform.
21. 291.▲
    TeaVM – Java Bytecode to JS(github.com)

    2 points by crudbug 11y ago|1 comments
22. 292.▲
    Opinionated Stack – Angular Kick(github.com)

    1 points by crudbug 11y ago|0 comments
23. 293.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    Kudos to the Xamarin management for this strategic move. (CIL BYTECODE / JVM BYTECODE) => LLVM => NATIVE
24. 294.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    Would like to see - Titan with Cassandra backend here.
25. 295.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    Having benchmarks for different storage models : Relational/Document/Graph/Object/XML, would be a better solution.
26. 296.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    +1
27. 297.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    Great work, I would suggest decoupling the front-end react components to create a separate widget library.
28. 298.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    Are there any good component libraries for React ? JSF ecosystem is a good example of component based web UIs.
29. 299.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    They missed the ship without dead simple bookmark service a.k.a Pocket !
30. 300.▲
    by crudbug 11y ago

    I would look at vertx.io with reactjs.