crop_rotation

44 ms·

1. 691.▲
   by crop_rotation 4y ago

   I doubt anyone would want their livelihood to depend upon being able to create genuinely new things with extreme consistency.
2. 692.▲
   by crop_rotation 4y ago

   The amount of people who create genuinely new things is so tiny that I am not sure it is even relevant to the discussion. And here I mean genuinely new things, not translating some C lib to java or similar stuff, or changing existing librar
3. 693.▲
   by crop_rotation 4y ago

   You should try GPT4. It does use very reasonable variable, function, method class names. And if you point out that the code doesn't match your intent, it comes with new code fixing your issues. The code it generates is by no measure &q
4. 694.▲
   by crop_rotation 4y ago

   What happens to social mobility in the post GPT world. Given that knowledge work (not just software) has been one big option for people to climb the social ladder. If the AI can reasonably do all knowledge work in future, the amount of soci
5. 695.▲
   Ask HN: Will Large Language Models be like another industrial revolution

   4 points by crop_rotation 4y ago|3 comments
6. 696.▲
   by crop_rotation 4y ago

   This might be the biggest threat to Google search (apart from OS vendors changing defaults) in a long long time. One problem Google faces is that they have to make money via search. Several other products are subsidized via search, so takin