cromka

11 ms·

61.
by cromka 27d ago
When there's a clear problem with culture or procedures at the company, does FAA investigate the company itself and can they suspend or revoke the license?
62.
by cromka 28d ago
And to prove this point: this post went from page 1 to page 4 in a matter of hour, despite significant voteship. Posts are not ordered per count only, there's an algorithm and manually applied weighs involved.
63.
by cromka 28d ago
I don't know what to tell you. I hate Meta and social media but still use Instagram and Facebook, because that's the society we live in. Does this make me a hypocrite? Can I not wish for a different reality? Can I singlehandedly
64.
by cromka 28d ago
I absolutely do, in fact I do post on the subject as well. I just think the amount of AI news is overbearing and I do not feel like HN is a good enough source for IT news anymore. Sure, I can use another medium, but that's not the po
65.
by cromka 28d ago
If people here barely see any non-AI content, then that non-AI content doesn't get interacted with, have interesting comments, etc. Filtering HN for yourself does not have the same effect as surfacing more non-AI content to every one.
66.
by cromka 28d ago
> This is a solved problem. It is not. If people here barely see any non-AI content, then that non-AI content doesn't get interacted with, have interesting comments, etc. Filtering for yourself does not have the same effect as sur
67.
by cromka 28d ago
> But HN simply ranks posts by upvotes. As others pointed out: a) HN absolutely does apply weighs to some topics b) bots
68.
by cromka 28d ago
It's astonishing how much faster the system is under the coreboot. I wonder what specifically can this be attributed to?
69.
by cromka 28d ago
There's actually piezoelectric effect in use here too, except on very small scale. It's quite ingenious, in my opinion and I root for that technology.
70.
by cromka 28d ago
Right, but my point was about what they said about the use-case. They couldn't have been coming here for AI news since 2017. So did they finally find their use-case for HN some 2 years ago? If they were indeed coming here before AI rev
71.
by cromka 28d ago
> You want No, bud. That's what your projection says. I said clearly I suggest HN curate more or give tools to self-curate. > The way you're responding How am I responding? > makes me dislike your idea even more. OK
72.
by cromka 28d ago
> My point is that maybe it's better to develop CPUs with less power consumption than to invent new cooling techniques And why not both? Because that's exactly what's happening. Vapor chambers? Heatsinks before that?
73.
by cromka 28d ago
> The problem here is you want your vote to count more That's just your projection.
74.
by cromka 28d ago
And cars not as big.
75.
by cromka 28d ago
> people here The best communities are ones that do not allow to be taken over by inorganic behavior. I think we can reasonably assume that not all AI front-page stuff is as interesting as other, non-AI stuff, yet here we are.
76.
by cromka 28d ago
I do NOT have a problem with AI. Again, the problem is with the flooding that drowns-out other news. I intentionally say "limit the AI news" in this post's title.
77.
by cromka 28d ago
Which kind of makes my point: these pages filter AI stuff, but do not make room for non-AI stuff.
78.
by cromka 28d ago
> not that interesting or new. Its parameters are! That's the whole point! 830g with regular 30W TDP Lunar Lake is impressive. > Braxman is a well-known scammer Which is interesting as I didn't know that and seems like you&#
79.
by cromka 28d ago
> never runs the fan (does it have one, I don't know) > so the Airjet thing (for me) is pretty much a solution in search of a problem. That's it? Fan is about noise and nothing else? The much lower volume/dissipation an
80.
by cromka 28d ago
That should be somewhat feasible to be done objectively, now that we have LLM text fingerprinting regulations in place.
81.
by cromka 28d ago
> Or the main topics just changed to something you are not that interested in, I never said I AM NOT interested in AI. Can you re-read my post with an open mind? > If I would not like to hear about funding rounds when money was cheap,
82.
by cromka 28d ago
Fair, didn't know that. But that proves some editing is in place, it could be a bit more active, perhaps.
83.
by cromka 28d ago
Fair, didn't know that. But that proves some editing is in place, it could be a bit more active, perhaps.
84.
by cromka 28d ago
I thought so, too! There aren't too many in this field that do this and I think they deserve some recognition only because of that. They're also not entirely new, their previous product has been around for a while. BTW. Their tabl
85.
by cromka 28d ago
I'm sorry, who said anything about banning AI?
86.
by cromka 28d ago
Yes.
87.
by cromka 28d ago
Fair, but I think that's only for "Show HN" stuff?
88.
by cromka 28d ago
OK, this is cool, actually! Thanks! It cannot be a long-term solution, though. Most people don't use them and if HN continues to be AI-foremost, many will simply stop coming here to post other interesting, non-AI stuff. A vicious circl
89.
by cromka 28d ago
I am not, HN was this product, it just changed. Hence the invitation to discussion on the subject.
90.
by cromka 28d ago
> I noticed it as well but I don’t see a problem with it. Again, I don't have a problem with AI news, I have a problem with missing out on other news that simply don't surface the news from the "New" abyss.

More ›