croes

72 ms·

961.
by croes 8mo ago
That where only the collaterals of the drone strikes. More people are killed with at least 17% innocent civilians
962.
by croes 8mo ago
Since when are drone strikes the legal way to handle criminals. I remember something with trials before you can kill people.
963.
by croes 8mo ago
They mean the 5% of 1250 killed by drones
964.
by croes 8mo ago
> of course within normal restrictions like 18+, consent of portrayed parties etc Of course xAI ignores that on purpose
965.
by croes 8mo ago
They trample science, the Paradox of tolerance in action. Who fights can lose, who doesn't fight has already lost.
966.
by croes 8mo ago
Don‘t you see the contradiction? I don’t trust the agent so I sandbox it before I gave it the access data to my mail and bank accounts
967.
by croes 8mo ago
And parent is from the EU and talks about age control in general. Does the US have a zero-knowledge proof system that is mentioned in the discussion?
968.
by croes 8mo ago
Welcome to the world where many countries aren’t the US
969.
by croes 8mo ago
You‘re missing the point > Having said that, open-source zero-knowledge proofs are infinitely less evil (I refuse to say "better") than commercial cloud-based age monitoring baked into every OS Parent prefers more control by pa
970.
by croes 8mo ago
Who controls your age if you try to buy alcohol. Who controls your age if you want to see an R-rated movie? This is simply extending the same level of control to the internet. More control for parents is a completely different level.
971.
by croes 8mo ago
You could make the same case for parental control as evil. "You‘re reading about evolution! Not in my house"
972.
by croes 8mo ago
Can you use an apple notebook without an apple account?
973.
by croes 8mo ago
Where does it say that AI is blamed. It says she was misidentified using facial recognition. That’s exactly what happened
974.
by croes 8mo ago
Shall I implement it, has to options Yes = do it No = don‘t do it
975.
by croes 8mo ago
No is a pretty clear statement
976.
by croes 8mo ago
In no context does no means yes if the question is "shall I implement it"
977.
by croes 8mo ago
And then came 2008, so that boom was built on fraud.
978.
by croes 8mo ago
But the people of the stereotype helped those idiots to come to power.
979.
by croes 8mo ago
Agent hacking is just a the beginning, it’s a bit early to think it’s a solved problem
980.
by croes 8mo ago
> You cannot buy an x86 PC laptop in the $600–700 price range that competes with the MacBook Neo on any metric — performance, display quality, audio quality, or build quality. You don’t have to if the software you need needs Windows.
981.
by croes 8mo ago
So if they use an AI avatar so can you.
982.
by croes 8mo ago
What does he say now?
983.
by croes 8mo ago
Technically they could claim it’s a backup
984.
by croes 8mo ago
But there is a difference between insecure against your actions or because of you actions. Someone breaking in into your system and doing damage is different to handing out the key to an agent that does the damage. AI has still too many lim
985.
by croes 8mo ago
Of course it‘s more secure but it doesn’t mean it’s secure.
986.
by croes 8mo ago
Didn‘t we something similar with antibiotics? At first they helped against a broad spectrum of bacteria but then the bacteria evolved. Damn you Darwin and your evolution.
987.
by croes 8mo ago
More like giving your access to a PA service company where you don’t know the actual PA. But you know those PAs have done some terrible mistake, are quite stupid sometimes and fall for tricks like prompt injection. If you give a stranger ac
988.
by croes 8mo ago
Security is quite impossible because they need access to your data which makes it insecure by default. Sandboxing fixes only one security issue.
989.
by croes 8mo ago
Facebook vs Moltbook, just what parent wrote
990.
by croes 8mo ago
It isn’t shallow. Who’s going to use it?

More ›