criswell

17 ms·

121.
by criswell 13y ago
Personally, I do. It's not my money, though, so it's none of my business.
122.
by criswell 14y ago
This is why I don't. If you don't support an open internet I don't support you. I'm also not crazy about the hunting elephants thing.
123.
by criswell 14y ago
I don't think I could pull it off. I admire it so much but I doubt I'm interesting enough to spend two months alone. I'd definitely break.
124.
by criswell 14y ago
Someone's Christmas Eve just went south. Godspeed.
125.
by criswell 14y ago
How does this do against something like BrowserStack? I love BrowserStack, but it can be really slow and unresponsive at times.
126.
by criswell 14y ago
Yeah, I didn't die once. Unacceptable.
127.
by criswell 14y ago
tldr.com would be such a sweet domain name. It doesn't look like it's getting much use right now, either. I wonder if they'd sell.
128.
by criswell 14y ago
I didn't start doing this till I started programming. It never occurred to me how much more logical this approach was till then.
129.
by criswell 14y ago
I love the attention to usability in the first answer.
130.
by criswell 14y ago
Best viewed in Netscape 4.7.
131.
by criswell 14y ago
I suffer from this as well. It's called Analysis Paralysis. Now, I just need to figure out the best way to stop it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analysis_paralysis
132.
by criswell 14y ago
This is the internet at its most awesome.
133.
by criswell 14y ago
The site doesn't even seem close to being useful or complete yet. I think it's intentional.
134.
by criswell 14y ago
This is tabular data gone awry.
135.
by criswell 14y ago
I disagree about the design part. This would work so much better as tabular data. Also, as someone said earlier, having to click that X to view another company's information is a pain in the ass. They also use the word "sort" when they actu
136.
by criswell 14y ago
My vote is for infinite distraction. Government is taking advantage of this right now. They can already do basically whatever they want without that much blowback.
137.
by criswell 14y ago
You can also just do button[class^=button] and use class names like "button-primary". It would be less repetitive code in the output CSS and less in the HTML. I'm so glad attribute selectors are actually OK to use now.
138.
by criswell 14y ago
I think this is a big waste of space if you're already following someone, what they're talking about should be the primary focus. I wonder if they'll start with the view scrolled down a bit how cover photos on Facebook do.
139.
by criswell 14y ago
It really all depends how intrusive ads are for me. As long as it doesn't keep me from doing what I want to do I can ignore it pretty easily.
140.
by criswell 14y ago
Foundation does seem really cool but there's a lot of little things that kind of bother me. Take a look at their "tabs" documentation ( http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/tabs.php ). Is a <dl> really the best element for tabs? The mark
141.
by criswell 14y ago
I thought it was just a regular joke. I'll try to make it less reddity next time.
142.
by criswell 14y ago
I had a feeling she just had a screw loose.
143.
by criswell 14y ago
The good ol' DHTML days!
144.
by criswell 14y ago
You'll probably have to use a lot of !important if you're using not-very specific selectors.
145.
by criswell 14y ago
I like the simple new design. Everything that I need is there and nothing more. Huge improvement over the last design.
146.
by criswell 14y ago
Why do I feel like the only person who doesn't mind iTunes?
147.
by criswell 14y ago
I hope they still provide a regular remote of some sort. I don't want to have to unlock a tablet and go to an app to change the channel.
148.
by criswell 14y ago
A "tweak" is basically their way of saying a half an hour's worth of work ( http://www.tweaky.com/faq ). All those home page examples would be much more than a tweak besides maybe "remove white space". I think it's misleading. It would be W
149.
by criswell 14y ago
The word "Kickstrapizing" made me throw up in my mouth a little.