creshal

60 ms·

901.
by creshal 6y ago
Allegedly, if you trust Intel.
902.
by creshal 6y ago
In an ideal world, maybe/hopefully. But Signal is already awful at hiding your identity¹, tying a public key to your already leaky Signal account isn't going to improve anything. ¹: https://technology.inquirer.net/
903.
by creshal 6y ago
"private payment" ≠ "payment using an ID that can be trivially linked to your phone number on an indelible public record"
904.
by creshal 6y ago
> The specific representation (the part that has value) is protected by elliptic curve cryptography. I don't think calling this "protected" is reasonable. You have some very weak guarantees that apply to one particular NFT
905.
by creshal 6y ago
We have a bunch of cursed USB-C cables that exhibit this behaviour. So the orientation matters, but only with some cables and only with some devices (that use 2.0)… good luck explaining that to office staff. Sigh.
906.
by creshal 6y ago
If we were to use it (which would need gitlab/mattermost integration as mentioned before), we'd very much depend on having a self hosted option.
907.
by creshal 6y ago
Gitlab/Mattermost integrations would be nice to see.
908.
by creshal 6y ago
People can't just spin up new realities and re-sell the same original Picasso painting to 30 more people, but we can spin up infinite amounts of new NTF blockchains and submit the same JPEG to all of them. You cannot limit ownership
909.
by creshal 6y ago
> I don't get it. Who profits from this? The genius scammers who managed to turn timestamp signing into an art form free from all responsibility for the "service" they monetize.
910.
by creshal 6y ago
> has he considered that Google has a valid point? Then why did Google not flag this during one of their release reviews? Randomly banning already approved apps over minor wording problems without giving devs any time to react is insane.
911.
by creshal 6y ago
When did Google ever set clear rules? It's all rubber paragraphs that are enforced at the whim of anonymous bureaucrats who will never be held responsible for whatever decisions they make.
912.
by creshal 6y ago
Citibank is a leading expert in losing your money, MongoDB is a perfect fit for their business model.
913.
by creshal 6y ago
We don't need "modern retro", existing computers are perfectly capable of running efficient software, people just need to actually write it.
914.
by creshal 6y ago
I think it's still supported, as far any software Samsung releases can be counted as "supported" in the first place.
915.
by creshal 6y ago
> Android takes care of your contacts Google contacts. , passwords, Google app passwords. > wifi settings, Because you can't not use Google's app for it. > browser settings, Google Chrome settings. > photos, Google pho
916.
by creshal 6y ago
Those devices never get upgraded to new Android versions so that's not something Android devs worry about. Hardware manufacturers just have to beef up the next generation of low end phones! (Cue KaiOS eating away all the low end market
917.
by creshal 6y ago
4+k daily visitors on one of the biggest fan sites for a popular mobile game, and I'm still running it with sqlite as DB backend and no caching on a shared VPS.
918.
by creshal 6y ago
Docker ≠ containers You can run lxc/nspawn containers as lightweight VMs and save a lot of (runtime, management) overhead without having to worry about any of Docker's or k8s's quirks. We're quite happy with that approac
919.
by creshal 6y ago
> I cannot imagine a performant server, bandwith and the employee it takes to maintain it to be cheaper than the 10€/month/user for a hosted solution. Gitlab and gitea don't have that high performance requirements, especia
920.
by creshal 6y ago
Git is decentralized by default, so all you really need is for your self-hosted version to not crash at the same time as github does. That's not too hard to pull off.
921.
by creshal 6y ago
It should be possible, but I'm not sure if PHP has the kind of community drive behind it to make it a realistic option. Or a necessary one – emscripten's main use case is "everyone has a browser", but there's very f
922.
by creshal 6y ago
> what is the job prospect looking like? I hope you like working on legacy projects full of spaghetti code.
923.
by creshal 6y ago
> I don't think fewer people self-host. There are some going to big clouds, there are some using integrated offerings like squarespace, but there are still many hosting their website with a regular hoster. And probably in total many
924.
by creshal 6y ago
> why does a language need to be constantly revolutionary if it solves what it sets out to solve well? That's a very big If in PHP's case.
925.
by creshal 6y ago
From ripgrep's FAQ: > Do you care about POSIX compatibility? If so, then you can't use ripgrep because it never was, isn't and never will be POSIX compatible.
926.
by creshal 6y ago
exa still just flat out crashes when supplied with a ctime pre 1970. If that's supposed to be a poster child of how well rust tools work, I fully understand Theo's vitriol.
927.
by creshal 7y ago
• Support channels for various open source projects • Fallback in case the new-fangled webshit breaks for the fifth time a month • Old communities that see no point in moving to said often breaking webshit But none of this has any growth po
928.
by creshal 7y ago
Modularity isn't free. Wordpress' obsession with it – and bad implementation of it – leads to bizarre, 80000+ recursion level deep callback hells even on simple pages once you have 3-4 plugins running.
929.
by creshal 7y ago
The plugin exists to inject seo-relevant tags into your page, so I don't see how a permission system would help to prevent them from injecting other tags into your page. And no, there's no real capability system for plugins in W
930.
by creshal 7y ago
CloudFlare is handling it now, so doesn't seem to be too severe.

More ›