Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
crashabr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
crashabr
10mo ago
I've been wondering if it was a good replacement for the playwright mcp, at least for chrome-only testing.
32.
▲
by
crashabr
10mo ago
What does this add compared to Logseq's default journal view?
33.
▲
by
crashabr
10mo ago
It would be great to be able to share an attached terminal as well, as a lot of action happens there when programming.
34.
▲
by
crashabr
11mo ago
What kind of app do you use it for?
35.
▲
by
crashabr
11mo ago
Code existed before FOSS. Code that people collaborated on existed before FOSS. Code given away for free existed before FOSS. FOSS code, by itself, is not anything special. Licences also existed before FOSS, but open sources licences enabli
36.
▲
by
crashabr
11mo ago
What are they? The thing I value the most is the collaboration and the relational part, allowing to build pages that are essentially views on other data. The only one I'm looking forward currently is the next version of Logseq which wi
37.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
People have different level of tolerance to negative behavior. That includes both your team and your community. Having a clear rules allows you to 1) point both involved and uninvolved people to the code of conduct when you end up taking ac
38.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
How easy it is to pass an existing db schema to this library in order to generate a testable synthetic dataset?
39.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
I'm not sure I understand correctly: is it a new serverless offering competing with the likes of vercel and fly.io, but with a different technology and pricing strategy? And the wasm container means that I can deploy my streamlit of Fa
40.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
Nice job. Though it would be more useful to me as a cli app. A different take on tldr with live filtering of results based on what you're typing
41.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
I think you messed up something with your time-travelling setup. We're in the timeline where GPT5 did not become the all powerful sentient AI that Ai boosters promised us. Which timeline are you from?
42.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
How does it compare to the table view of a Logseq query? Is UI the main added value? Is it possible to build a base of content blocks rather than notes?
43.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
Do you intend to reach feature parity with something like MacWhisper? I'd love to switch to something open source, but automated meeting detection, push to transcribe (with custom rewrite actions) are two features I've learned to
44.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
What kind of machine do you need to run all of this concurrently?
45.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
> No moral choice is possible unless all your choices are moral. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/we-should-improve-society-som...
46.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
I'm a long time user of this snippet as well. I discovered fastgron [0] last year and found it convenient for some situations! [0] https://github.com/adamritter/fastgron
47.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
Anything you recommend instead?
48.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
> Does it matter that the computer had no skill, and the grandmaster did? Yes it does when pondering about the transferability of the skills mobilized to achieve the result (grandmaster status) to other domains.
49.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
Really nice! Have you thought of interfacing with the todo.txt ecosystem?
50.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
Really cool! My results were - 3 Dive 11 skim, 16 skip. - 1 dive would have been a skim, 2 skim would have been a skip, 2 skim would have been a dive, 4 skips would have been a skim, 1 skip would have been a dive. - Total mislabelled: 10, ~
51.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
Good stuff, thanks. As an aside, I didn't know that the popover technique could be done with html and CSS only, neat! I'll use this for my learning content in-line glossary links from now on.
52.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
Could you elaborate on why the graph structure is better than embeddings? Is it for a specific use case?
53.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
Do you mind sharing your prompt/approach?
54.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
Studies have shown that the more people use automated systems, the more they start to trust them, leaving to oversight. It's called [automation bias]( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automation_bias ). If a Cloudfla
55.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
Crazy coincidence as I just started setting up my PARA system on Logseq.
56.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
A shame that I just paid for Choosy. Oh well, it wasn't very expensive.
57.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
How does it compare to OpenRefine https://github.com/OpenRefine
58.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
I don't think prioritizing to be a struggle. The challenge is to take the time to list out of all the tasks that need to be ranked by order of priority.
59.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
Your comment is a breath of fresh air coming from the comment section between the article about self hosting emails. Even beyond the moral imperative, it's saddening how a website called hackernews seems to have such a high amount of l
60.
▲
by
crashabr
1y ago
The problem with deceptively correct information is that it leads us to take mental shortcuts that lead us to oversee details. If you do the work first, you've already avoided this problem. Instead, if the feedback of the llm doesn
More ›