cpan22

5 ms·

31.
by cpan22 6mo ago
Open source is something we're thinking about! We've just been focused on building for now but its definitely not off the table
32.
by cpan22 6mo ago
Thanks! Yeah we believe strongly that humans need to be in the code review loop to some extent I think one thing we've seen from early users that surprised us is how chapters was quickly becoming the unit of review for them as opposed
33.
by cpan22 6mo ago
Thanks! I think we're really focused on making the overall review experience as guided and obvious as possible for the human. Chapters is a great start but we're coming up with more ideas on how we can make the process even easier
34.
by cpan22 6mo ago
I agree, that's also really important and something we're brainstorming Currently on Stage we also generate a PR summary next to the chapters and that's where we want to do more "why" that pulls in context from Line
35.
by cpan22 6mo ago
We're also planning on adding functionality to support some sort of CHAPTERS.md file that lets you specify how you want things broken down!
36.
by cpan22 6mo ago
This is really cool and we definitely have this problem as well. I really like the flowchart deciding on where to put each learning. Will have to try it out! Do you find that this list of learnings that end up BUGBOT.md or LESSONS.md ever g
37.
Show HN: Stage – Putting humans back in control of code review(stagereview.app)
130 points by cpan22 6mo ago|111 comments
38.
by cpan22 6mo ago
But it majorly regressed in long context retrieval? Which is arguably getting more and more important?