cozzyd

8 ms·

121.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
Do linker scripts look the same in the rust tool chain? (E.g. for implementing a bootloader?)
122.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
Maybe it wasn't written in Tex. The kerning does look a bit suspect.
123.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
yep, it's a shame vscode doesn't do something similar and instead copies a huge runtime (evidently, multiple times?!?) onto unsuspecting hosts.
124.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
my 4-year old daughter likes them and is sad whenever they seem to get stuck in random places for no reason.
125.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
More importantly there's a really good band named isis that probably has not benefitted from the Islamic state. (Ok, they disbanded in 2010, but still).
126.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
I figure that's how much RAM I can expend for Microsoft products.
127.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
Indeed, it would be difficult for Iran to receive payment for passage through the straight or Hormuz without crypto or fir North Korea's ransomwwre economy to be so lucrative.
128.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
Yes that's the point. If vscode didn't insist on installing potentially gigabytes of blobs then this wouldn't be necessary. (I'm a vimmer anyway... And emacs is too bloated to fit too, conveniently.)
129.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
Per trip?
130.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
My newest yocto image mounts a 640K RO tmpfs on top of $HOME/.vscode-server to prevent people using VSCode from shitting all over the relatively small emmc.
131.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
For $9 I'll shed a tear.
132.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
Or waking them up for school... (A correlated problem)
133.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
Judging from user's posting history, they're not the biggest fans of llms This is kind of the perfect use case though -- it's a game who cares if it's right or not.
134.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
Yes. Not even just HPC clusters, shared login servers are pretty common in academia. I manage several in our lab. Sure, we mostly trust the users against malice more or less but not so much against incompetence. A malicious vscode plugin wo
135.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
Anecdotal of course, but I heard that this wasn't at all the case circa 2006 and that (then) FB employees would routinely read private messages and such. Obviously it wasn't a big company yet and probably didn't have those p
136.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
yeah, I assumed the whole thing was AI slop when I saw EL14...
137.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
There's an easy solution... release your code as GPL :) (but that doesn't protect you against GPL-incompatible copyleft licenses, I guess)
138.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
It's quite a minor difference
139.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
For radio detection, solid water is better because it has a much much longer radio attenuation length.
140.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
Everyone in the collaboration is an author. This is typical for particle physics collaborations. Not everyone contributed directly to this analysis of course, though everyone's feedback was solicited. Some people contributed to constru
141.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
It has to be nearish vertical (how close depends on energy, but it's a pretty wide band around vertical) so that all of its energy is not absorbed in the atmosphere. As you get closer to horizontal trajectories you go through way more
142.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
https://cthulhuforamerica.com/
143.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
Let me clarify, as someone involved in writing this paper. This radio emisison (Askaryan emission) is the mechanism by which we hope to detect neutrinos with detectors like ARA (and also PUEO, RNO-G, etc. which I also work on :) ), but the
144.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
that's... one way to put it :) The 5-station analysis covering a number of years is coming out soon (but searching for neutrinos, not impacting air showers, which is what this PRL is about) .
145.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
To be clear, the detection here is of a mundane cosmic ray that started interacting in the upper atmosphere, but came at such an angle (and the Antarctic plateau is high enough) that the cascade it started continued into the ice. But yes, o
146.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
Next time I go to the site to dig out a station, maybe I'll leave a Ctulhu to surprise the next person :)
147.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
A liquid you control (and can densely instrument) is going to be a much easier to characterize detector than large volumes of natural material
148.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
Depends on the energy scale involved! Higher energy = "easier" to detect (produce more light or radio emission), but the events are rarer so you want to build a bigger detector. There are also underwater pools of water being used
149.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
I was involved in this analysis if anybody has questions (though the student and postdoc did most of the real work) original article: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21104 or https://journals.aps.org/prl&#x
150.
by cozzyd 6mo ago
That's one way to fix supply chain vulnerabilities.

More ›