cowl

8 ms·

91.
by cowl 3y ago
My man you are arguing with an established case verdict. https://rewis.io/urteile/urteil/lhm-20-01-2022-3-o-1749320/ The wording that is irrelevant what Google does with the IP (just the theoretical possibi
92.
by cowl 3y ago
yes, Ubuntu is in violation of GDPR too if it does not connect for essential functionality. One essential functionality that is acceptable for any OS is that of checking for updates because Security is an essential part of OS.
93.
by cowl 3y ago
no, the IP should not be exposed to any third party not only to the final destination. Tor would hide the IP from the final destination but still expose it to the first relaying party.
94.
by cowl 3y ago
in the Google fonts CDN the court ruled that: it's irrelevant if the website or Google had the opportunity to link the IP address to the user. the mere possibility of this is enough to consider it as protected PII.
95.
by cowl 3y ago
Yes, I meant connecting to update/install in response to a user action that wants to install extension for "X functionality".
96.
by cowl 3y ago
There is no such thing as truly anonymous. in order to send any data you need to connect to a server. at that moment you are in violatation of GDPR because you are exposing the users's IP which is protected by GDPR. See the case where
97.
by cowl 3y ago
> The interface implementation as subtype could be replaced with explicit instantiation using an “extends” keyword, plus sum types, and it would have been a simpler approach. Sure if you want to remove one of the better features of Go, I
98.
by cowl 3y ago
do they though? first both of them and afaik all other routers need to reload so for all intents and purposes the routing table is static, you can not add routing rules during the runtime. (Their apparent "dynamism" comes because
99.
by cowl 3y ago
Strings with a well defined meaning that is not being taken into consideration here beyond routing.
100.
by cowl 3y ago
how about build time? just add a test and the "runtime" become build time.
101.
by cowl 3y ago
thing.Register() may register a route that conflicts with yours and it will never be matched in this case if declaration order was taken into account. You may discover this too late when you either have missed important calls on that thing
102.
by cowl 3y ago
It can not be decided on compile time but it provides the basis for a build time "error". It's enough to have a testcase that registers your routes and the bug is descovered even before you commit potentially.
103.
by cowl 3y ago
How does it go against the HTTP Spec. The HEAD method could be autoregistered for all handlers of GET Requests and library makes sure no body is sent (Basically it's a autoregistered middleware that wraps the get handler and overwrite
104.
by cowl 3y ago
"probably" is key Here. this introduces the possibility of typo erros that can even be discovered late. Now you will need a Vet check to make sure that GET, POST etc are written correctly instead of letting the compiler to do it&
105.
by cowl 3y ago
And I see no Harm on making this extreme wierd usecase less user-friendly and force you to go through panic recover rather than force everyone else that will never get errors to handle errors.
106.
by cowl 3y ago
> or let the user know Many are misunderstanding when the panic happens. It does not happen when the user requests the path, it happens when the path is registered. The user will never arrive at that path to be notified. You will be noti
107.
by cowl 3y ago
> I've (ab)used the behavior of "first to be matched wins" a ton in my career Even if the framework could guarantee the order of registration, this source-order heuristic is easy when you work alone or in a small team. Goo
108.
by cowl 3y ago
How is this new to Go? Almost all Java frameworks that rely on Annotations do registration at a distance. Controllers are Routinely declared on different packages and even injected from dependency libraries.
109.
by cowl 3y ago
you don't get it because all complaints have never been about ads, they have always been about the entitlement to have FREE content WITHOUT Ads. Now that they have the options of having paying content without ads they all come up with
110.
by cowl 3y ago
> You've always been able to change how the content that was sent is displayed No, you have ever been able to change what the content owner has sent as changable content. Browsers allow you to change a subset of the content. You c
111.
by cowl 3y ago
you request an URL, you can not specify what content that URL provides. This is not a new precedent or perspective. It's how Internet works. You can choose what the content owner chooses to let you choose. Try to choose the css attribu
112.
by cowl 3y ago
OTOH the French regulator should not be even aware of marketing PR days for the hundred pf phones they test so your comment is a distasteful attempt to ascribe a meaning where there is none.
113.
by cowl 3y ago
Well if it was for the "cellular EM waves are bad" movement as you put it they would have a problem with most cellular phones and not specifically with the iPhone 12 don't you think?
114.
by cowl 3y ago
what kind of question is that? what user does not care that the OS is not respecting his choice of Browser? It greatly impacts the daily work. You are logged in into services in your browser of choice, you have autofills in your default bro
115.
by cowl 3y ago
No competitor lobied for this. it's the users that "lobied".
116.
by cowl 3y ago
The player does not issue the card. The player does not profit from any "appreciation" of the cards. The amount of player cards sold is nowhere near that of NFTs so the potential damage is limited and the history of player cards h
117.
by cowl 3y ago
Exactly, back then we didn't even know that gold and lead were two single elements. We had the concepts of atoms yes but not of different elements that were "stable" on their own or that one atom could be different from anoth
118.
by cowl 3y ago
In retrospective you can say that Transmutation was a crackpot idea but that was not known at that time. Many "alchemists" where very rigorous chemistry experimentalists and Ultimately it turns out you can turn lead into gold, but
119.
by cowl 3y ago
> except that the 0.01% case is precisely what causes the damage (bots, fraud, piracy and so on). Thankyou, that's precisly my point. All this trouble is worth only for fighting fraud and bots and not for making sure that that 0.1%
120.
by cowl 3y ago
In what universe do you live that Google or anyone else should device this complicated scheme to just capture 2-3 people. Linux has only 3% share of the users. of those maybe 0.1% could write a kernel module (or even install one) and of tho

More ›