Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cosmojg
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
52 ms
·
631.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
http://archive.is/ThQGB
632.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Oh my God, the end of the article is absolute gold ! What a lovely tradition. I'm going to start offering piggyback rides to everyone I meet. Here's an excerpt of Alexia's experiences offering piggyback rides to various nota
633.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
> I clicked on their link and just skipped straight to their "Advanced User" recommendation, because this is HN, and they recommend Mullvad. Curious to see what HN users think of that one. They're the best VPN provider, ha
634.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
There are many social media platforms better than Facebook. If it disappeared tomorrow, people would simply relocate.
635.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Shouldn't people be held responsible for their own decisions?
636.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Could this be the same phenomenon which motivates theism, at least in part?
637.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Best guess: the conventional truth is boring. Next best guess: the conventional truth is inconvenient.
638.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Isn't this true in real life as well? Humans don't behave well in large groups both online and off.
639.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
https://aslmath.cosmo.red/ My ex was a math major before switching gears to become a sign language interpreter. She was disappointed by the quality of math-related ASL resources and had this idea for an ASL math dictionary,
640.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
My favorite part of this article isn't the content but the author's clever protest against JavaScript by way of progressive "dehancement." Simply disable JavaScript, and the gratuitous loading bars disappear!
641.
▲
Three Valued Structs
(flak.tedunangst.com)
5 points
by
cosmojg
6y ago
|
2 comments
642.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Are there any implementations of Knuth-Plass line breaking in HTML or CSS libraries? Maybe in a static site generator?
643.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Right, again, get rid of public keys with zero-knowledge proofs, and you've solved this problem. The only way to screw up is by publicly disclosing which messages are yours. Although, I guess a large part of the problem is that some us
644.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Oh, definitely, but that will get very expensive very quickly, especially with a self-updating difficulty mechanism. I don't see botnets being much of a problem outside of one-off posts (or maybe a few more for state actors).
645.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
> Manual human labor requirement creates a rate limiting which is removed by automated content creation in the name of the human. What if we impose artificial rate limiting with posting fees or some kind of proof-of-work requirement? &
646.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Heh, that's definitely the messier part of this. It all depends on your threat model and the scale of the community you're running. For a small group of trusted friends, one could distribute keys in person and enforce time-based k
647.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Zero-knowledge proofs solve this problem. Hell, even simple private key cryptography solves this problem. Distribute private keys to anonymous individuals who somehow prove their eligibility and only allow key holders to participate in the
648.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Satoshi is pseudonymous, not anonymous. Public key cryptography (like that used with Bitcoin) allows the former but not the latter.
649.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Whereabouts are you? Are there any festivals you'd recommend in particular?
650.
▲
Pursuing Speed, Pt. 2
(0xff.nu)
2 points
by
cosmojg
6y ago
|
0 comments
651.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Isn't that kinda what's already unfolding with ActivityPub? You've got Friendica for Facebook, Mastodon and Pleroma for Twitter, Lemmy for Reddit, WriteFreely and Plume for Medium, Funkwhale for SoundCloud, Peertube for YouTu
652.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
> Within the first hours of the attack, people were duped into sending more than $118,000 to the hackers.
653.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Sounds like we need to build better websites, and maybe cut back on the JavaScript.
654.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Huh? Why?
655.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
> Why exactly do you think that is? Canonical very publicly collaborated with these companies to get their software on the Snap store while Flathub has been handled in a more free-for-all manner. If you build it, they will come, and all
656.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Patatap is probably my absolute favorite of all time when it comes to this kind of thing: https://patatap.com/
657.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Liberapay[0] is my favorite. They're a nonprofit funded by donations through their own platform, and they don't charge any fees. [0] https://en.liberapay.com/about/
658.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Are you running Firefox Preview/Nightly? I've found them to be even faster than Chrome on my device.
659.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
Indeed, it is. That's why this exists: https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium
660.
▲
by
cosmojg
6y ago
This really feels like an overcomplicated step in the wrong direction compared to VimWiki: https://github.com/vimwiki/vimwiki
More ›