corbulo

17 ms·

121.
by corbulo 4y ago
Good books are far from passive. The worse a book is the more passive, but the reader always has to use reading comprehension to understand a book.
122.
by corbulo 4y ago
You should read their 10-Q reports to figure out how they're violating their fiduciary duty with your claims here. You'd win millions of dollars in that suit.
123.
by corbulo 4y ago
I don't care who you cite. I'm not playing some dumb 'my team' game lol He used to work for The Young Turks, hosts streams with AOC and Ilhan Omar, is quoted as saying, "On Crenshaw, Piker said, "What the fuck
124.
by corbulo 4y ago
Saying Meta is just a single app is like saying Google is just a search engine or Amazon is just a e-commerce site. Meta while unsurprisingly not very efficient, does need a lot of employees to maintain what they've built.
125.
by corbulo 4y ago
First: define capitalism Second: list famines
126.
by corbulo 4y ago
There isn't clear messaging on where the money is coming from to cover depositors. Thats whats leading to no one even factually knowing whats happening.
127.
by corbulo 4y ago
Long covid can be measured directly or indirectly in a blood sample? Please provide literature on that.
128.
by corbulo 4y ago
Hasan isn't an extremist?
129.
by corbulo 4y ago
E sports is heavily investor dependent. Which means rates go up and itll dry up. I would be really surprised if any of it directly generated a profit. Its for game sales long term.
130.
by corbulo 4y ago
The onus is on the people making the claim to prove its real. So far theyve collected information on it so negligently it should really just be called data fraud. Pretty obvious whats happening when thats the case.
131.
by corbulo 4y ago
Theyre neoliberals. Hardly a better mold that fits them.
132.
by corbulo 4y ago
In my experience on reddit every interaction starts from 0 with minimal if any shared knowledge. You speak of people debating communism vs socialism vs pro-market democrats, etc. etc. are these debates rich with historical and philosophica
133.
by corbulo 4y ago
Reddit of 10+ years ago wasn't terrible even if naive. HN is fine. Just interactions that aren't mostly oppressive in favor of a groupthink. Twitter is unironically better for discourse than reddit, particularly now. There is no r
134.
by corbulo 4y ago
The problem with political subreddits is they have gigantic blind spots due to heavy groupthink and constant obsession with semantics and labeling. I've never seen a discussion of why some political idea is better than another getting
135.
by corbulo 4y ago
The natural cycle of communities on reddit is being overrun by r/all and becoming popular enough for some careerist mod to seek a position there and play politics, eventually bending it to some commercial or ideological interest person
136.
by corbulo 4y ago
Reddit is a negative image of context and nuance. That site repels anyone who knows anything about anything.
137.
by corbulo 4y ago
NFTs best real usecase was in logistics as a kind of unique item-ledger providing a secure history of custody and important details about the item of concern during its movements. All the digital ownership stuff is whack funny money low rat
138.
by corbulo 4y ago
I think you're underestimating how twisted these peoples pathologies can get. They don't see any of it logically. They're exploitative monsters because they have no emotional control or situational awareness. Words of strange
139.
by corbulo 4y ago
>Enter CBDCs Your sentiment is common, particularly among central bankers. It feels kind of by design with the current international economic trends, but at the same time this seems like a pretty natural course of events when you have st
140.
by corbulo 4y ago
It's the state giving itself no bid contracts. There's no financial risk (except to the buyers) and the officials who secured it get the money. The buildings aren't made to a high standard because there's no accountabili
141.
by corbulo 4y ago
Is it? The Chinese already do this. Go look at how its working out for them, the pros and cons are clear and obvious.
142.
by corbulo 4y ago
Thats what China does and what CBDCs are about. See: Tofu Dreg projects and social credit score system. With privatization you get decentralization.
143.
by corbulo 4y ago
There are risk profiles between crypto/sv banks and JPM & co. lol What is this sentiment called? SVCentrism?
144.
by corbulo 4y ago
If you can predict what the fed is gonna do when its gonna do it you should be incredibly rich with that information.
145.
by corbulo 4y ago
> Most of the risk to the bank remains If everything else stays the same sure. Bankers would get creative really quickly to put most of their gains somewhere else. SVB wasn't necessarily playing fast and loose more than anyone else.
146.
by corbulo 4y ago
Thats a really rosy view of shorts. They are much more oppressive than you're painting them.
147.
by corbulo 4y ago
You're in spirit asking for a state bank, not modified private banks. Thats the only way you would get the 'result' you're looking for. Many private banks with unlimited deposit insurance would simply play more fast and
148.
by corbulo 4y ago
you're calling for the state to insure 100% of all deposits?
149.
by corbulo 4y ago
what are the implications of a bank that cannot fail no matter how reckless it is with everyones money?
150.
by corbulo 4y ago
Anonymizing risk is not a better system. Think a few consequences down the line...no one knows who theyre lending money to or from, its all figured out by AI/LLMs and as long as the incident rate is below a certain percent in a random

More ›