corbulo

31 ms·

331.
by corbulo 4y ago
I think the article has some points (I wholly reject the heavy handed political shit in there) but agree with most of what you say. As with most Vice articles it's got a heavy slant to it. ChatGPT, and LLMs more broadly, are a semantic
332.
ChatGPT Is a Bullshit Generator Waging Class War(vice.com)
8 points by corbulo 4y ago|6 comments
333.
by corbulo 4y ago
The utility is doing a majority of the work and you do adlib, not 100% and outright replacing the legal profession. That would require good AGI. Anyone using the current general LLMs to replace 100% of their work is very short sighted.
334.
by corbulo 4y ago
It was an issue that he spotted and replied to multiple accounts about it, then tested it on his own account. It's really unfortunate to see so many people here in lockstep with the Musk is Tech Hitler media corps. I thought this place
335.
by corbulo 4y ago
Streaming has made entertainment a hyper-competitive field that is no longer fixed to any time blocks. How could the Oscars compete? Would you rather watch the rise of Pablo Escobar or Matt Damon open an envelope in the most smug, self cong
336.
by corbulo 4y ago
Profit is ethical in abstract if you're intelligent and can see how reputation is valuable. You will have a hard time getting people to buy your product if people hate you. We're not in the state we're in because of profit mo
337.
by corbulo 4y ago
Your standard for productivity is 'not collapse'?
338.
by corbulo 4y ago
AskHistorians is a great resource until you watch how topics in your area of expertise are answered and the kind of diversion from wide consensus that is tolerated with scant sourcing. It basically mirrors whats been happening to academia.
339.
by corbulo 4y ago
The term you're looking for is deep context. These general LLMs are a long ways away from being good at many layers of context like specialized litigation, internal research papers, basically anything you wouldn't be able to expec
340.
by corbulo 4y ago
I'm not sure there's anything wrong with that. Technology has always been only as good as its implementation.