coolhand2120

12 ms·

91.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Is that not the actual definition of spam? Unwanted solicitation? Why would it matter what the content of the message is?
92.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
As someone who has pissed away thousands of team hours working with the next.js abomination I’m very happy to see Astro take off. I keep thinking “this looks like one of my very first terribly architected, organically created messes”. Astr
93.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
If you serve data from a DC in California to the west coast of Australia it will take 10 seconds of just network transfer time. Sometimes data has a high degree of cardinality and cannot be cached. Some companies cannot afford to, or for
94.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Reading that entire thing was a struggle. Really feels like _everyone_ is wrong here. Yes the current state of FE development is overly dogmatic and cultish. But it always has been. On the other hand the frameworks and build systems are
95.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Bwahahhahahahahahhhahhahaahhaahahahhahahahhahahhahhaahhaahhahahahahhhha No wait, you’re serious? Did you not watch the senate testimony? They have illegally spied on millions upon millions of Americans. For things as petty as “I think thi
96.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Perhaps you’re not looking hard enough https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis
97.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
We were hoping you would forget.
98.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
How sure are you of the rareness? What if you looked into the VAERS data and it told you adverse side effects were several orders of magnitude more common than any other approved vaccine? Might want to look that up.
99.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Mostly obfuscate and lie. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis It’s bad. It’s so bad we’re at the “coin flip is about as reliable” stage of science. In some soft sciences almost 75% of studies cannot be
100.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Is that true? Do you have any citation? It sounds incredible. Every study?
101.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
> You've written a dense "paragraph" that doesn't really lead itself to argument or even... reading it. Writing on some mobile devices does not lend itself to proper formatting. I tend to write when and where I feel
102.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
You’re absolutely right! It feels like an appeal to emotion more than any academic revelation. And the “rigor and honesty are not in doubt” part… really the conclusion of that episode was the beginning of the end of “trust the science!” f
103.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Apparently you’re not a bowler. And what if I’m a pro golfer? What if I suffer from needing to play a guitar? There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
104.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
I had to stop reading at "Latinx". Stop trying to make latinx happen, nobody wants it.
105.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Do you think their chances of landing a programming job is enhanced or degraded by learning about programming? You’re arguing for ignorance. Not a great position to take.
106.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Pfft, yeah, software devs. What good have they ever produced for society or those who depend on them. Better teach them how to dig ditches and truly unleash their human potential.
107.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Many people think it is a conspiracy theory. I believe it’s the source of so much that ails our regulatory system. I was hoping to spark a conversation with people who both agree and disagree with as little effort as possible. Seems my a
108.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
> It has been hypothesized that Amundsen Sea warming will respond to future climate change and may be amenable to mitigation by reducing greenhouse gas emissions6,9,10. However, this hypothesis has not been adequately tested. Existing fu
109.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
It was sarcasm. But thank you for the definition. I’m not sure what part of my comment is incoherent. Missing punctuating?
110.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Regulatory capture is a conspiracy theory
111.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Don’t hold your breath expecting rules to be applied equally.
112.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Wow, amnesty international was a signatory before the backlash. Really speaks volumes of them.
113.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
That’s not the case here. No mistake was made. And yes, typically you would issue a retraction or “unpublish” as you call it.
114.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
So if I was a former member of the KKK and someone published that they are the bad guy?
115.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Time for the ministry of love!!!
116.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
https://xkcd.com/538/ If you are jailed for using it I’ll bet people curtail use. Also, I would say it’s mathematically impossible to break in a practical amount of time, but physically quite vulnerable when you think
117.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
In my work LUTs are a reaction to really poor performance, not a matter of course. Every time I reach for one my inner dialog says “you (probably) should use a lookup table”.
118.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
Because of the virus or because of the mRNA vax? We now know mRNA shots from the vax causes this exact symptom. How are they differentiating between these cohorts? They’re using PCR tests which are notorious for false positive. Then the
119.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
What happens when fake/fraud/whatever is > 50% as it is in some domains of science? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis I believe something that is not falsifiable is not science. So what
120.
by coolhand2120 3y ago
With this system, I’m many domains, a -majority- of published research is not reproducible. Possibly worse than a coin flip. Do you really think this is “reasonably well”. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_c

More ›