cool_hw

6 ms·

31.
by cool_hw 4y ago
As I shared in another post, compared to my linux machine, most of the posts, including yours, have atleast 5x-10x the usage. I understand that disk usage can vary wildly, but the linux machine I'm comparing with has been used through
32.
by cool_hw 4y ago
Thanks for sharing, that's a lot of reads/writes.
33.
by cool_hw 4y ago
> seems fixed? My linux machine that I have used for professional development for 6 years now reports (typed out the relevant bits by hand). Data Units Read: ...[4.44 TB] Data Units Written: .
34.
by cool_hw 4y ago
Wow. What is the SSD capacity? So 226TB is ~8% for this capacity, i.e., about 28.25TB per 1%, so about 2825TB expected TBW. Ignoring the fact that this is ignoring many factors contributing to the life span, it's still quite an interes
35.
by cool_hw 4y ago
Your read/writes seem to be comparable to the parent, but your power on hours are significantly lower, really hard to draw any conclusions here. I wonder if this whole issue is simply MacOS dumping the stuff in memory to disk when goin
36.
by cool_hw 4y ago
That is good to note, I wonder how accurate it is. Can you share how long you've had it and the typical usage (hours and disk activity)?
37.
by cool_hw 4y ago
I don't use Chrome and this is not related to Chrome. In fact, this is on a pretty fresh MacOS (Monterey) install.
38.
Ask HN: Has the Apple Silicon excessive disk read/write issue been fixed?
125 points by cool_hw 4y ago|135 comments
39.
n/a
3 points by cool_hw 4y ago|2 comments