Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
consensus1
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
91.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
"Freely available" doesn't mean they are free of charge, but that they can be obtained at any time with minimal effort.
92.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
Cigarettes and alcohol are freely available to kids
93.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
OK, that's fair. I don't deny I broke the rules there. I was just surprised at the unevenness because I assumed you had seen the context.
94.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
This is the comment I was replying to: > I read that left-wing people are consistently found to be much more able to process conflicting ideas than right-wing people are. Nothing in your guidelines tells me how this comment is ok, but so
95.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
Yes I'm sure that is genuine belief and not just a manifestation of envy. I can't describe the level of contempt I have for people who go around opining on how much money they think other people should have.
96.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
It doesn't rise to the level of critique. Just baseless accusations and conspiracy theories. Success speaks for itself and the mental gymnastics of those that deny it screams "envy" as loudly as if it was written on the accu
97.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
They must be seething in envy at the superior returns of the average HN naysayer who has been predicting the imminent collapse of all the "scams" Elon Musk is running for the last several years.
98.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
Who has delivered better value for money on government contracts than SpaceX?
99.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
Envy is a hell of a drug
100.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
Have you got any evidence for these claims?
101.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
I'm not seeing it. > “Will be in the BVI/St Bart’s area over the holidays. Is there a good time to visit?” Musk states on 13 December 2013. > “any day 1st - 8th . play it by ear if you want. always space for you,” Epstein re
102.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
They don't have to be willing because hiding the losses would be a crime. And it still doesn't matter b/c anyone with a calculator can tell you exactly what the value of their position is on any given day. The $94 billion i
103.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
You should stop asking people for money for any other reason except that you provide value in return. Your enjoyment is your own business.
104.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
I don't have a CS degree, and I am talking about inbound recruiter emails, so it's not credentialism or networking. I did get my current job via networking though, but networking in this industry isn't really any more than &q
105.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
If somebody is paying you to do something and someone else comes along that can do that thing much better than you and/or for less money you've got a problem. Whether or not you call the person paying that money a customer or use
106.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
The AI will not stop them, or anyone else, from doing what they enjoy. It will stop them from getting paid for it. And nobody has the right to get paid for having fun. To get paid you need to deliver customer value.
107.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
US fintech. Language / framework agnostic.
108.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
Why would that be different? It seems right now that tech billionaires are the group that is most in favor of advancing technology. What politically powerful group would it be more in my interest to hold power?
109.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
Sample size of 1 here, but my inbox is absolutely overflowing with recruiters. Sample size of more than 1 - the SWE who were laid off recently from my company are finding new jobs quickly. Certainly the job market is more brutal than it wa
110.
▲
by
consensus1
2mo ago
It does and has done so consistently throughout human history, so I do not believe this will be any different. I couldn't care less what the shared amount of money is because it some billionaire gets another million and I get a thousa
111.
▲
by
consensus1
3mo ago
Rockets have a self destruct feature to avoid exactly this type of contingency
112.
▲
by
consensus1
3mo ago
It is an indisputable fact that "commercial advantage" in terms of copyright means selling copies. It is also an indisputable fact that Anthropic did npt do that.
113.
▲
by
consensus1
3mo ago
I would like to see a citation on that b/c I am unaware of it. The only case I see in SDNY is the NYT v OpenAI case which has not been ruled on yet. https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/copyright-law-
114.
▲
by
consensus1
3mo ago
You are asking to prove a negative. But even assuming that the model is capable of returning every bit of its training data verbatim (a mathematical impossibility) that would not be enough as mere capability is insufficient here. If capab
115.
▲
by
consensus1
3mo ago
That is a false statement. Gaining commercial advantage means selling pirated copies which Anthropic absolutely did not do, so none of your following statements are correct either.
116.
▲
by
consensus1
3mo ago
1/4 resolution, but still 100% of the movie. There's not really an equivalent for a book.
117.
▲
by
consensus1
3mo ago
A model absolutely could be trained to engage in malicious behavior like that, but it seems impractical for an actual attack. What you want as an attacker is to insert a backdoor exactly where you want it an not where you don't becaus
118.
▲
by
consensus1
3mo ago
Biased sample, but basically everyone I know on either side of politics agrees with that.
119.
▲
by
consensus1
3mo ago
Well you'll need to keep waiting because I never made such a claim and therefore I have no need to justify it.
120.
▲
by
consensus1
3mo ago
Residential electricity rates don't get "bid up" like that. Increases typically must be approved by the government and have to be justified by expenses rather than market prices. Ashburn VA, which has more data centers than
More ›