conradkay

5 ms·

61.
by conradkay 6mo ago
https://htmx.org/essays/locality-of-behaviour/ I'm not a big tailwind fan, but keeping styling in a separate file feels like a net negative
62.
by conradkay 6mo ago
If they wanted couldn't they do something like RLHF? Instead of humans picking the best of 2 text outputs, they pick the best rendered design
63.
by conradkay 6mo ago
Codex had 2x usage until April 1, I think when that ended there were a lot more people (like myself) who were fine on $20 but now want more usage
64.
by conradkay 6mo ago
Anthropic is the exact same way, I think they're just trying to avoid having 5 different subscription tiers visible. Probably needing 20x is very niche
65.
by conradkay 6mo ago
Yeah it's probably a bit better overall. 5.4 is a month newer than Opus 4.6 My guess is that 5.5 will come out soon and be significantly better so you'd want to be using Codex then, but then when Opus 5 comes out probably back to
66.
by conradkay 6mo ago
Stock up 9% today, very pleasant for Zuck if you do the math on his net worth :)
67.
by conradkay 6mo ago
It doesn't seem benchmaxxed, ARC AGI 2 score is quite bad (42.5%, GPT 5.4 is 76.1%) and coding is okay. But maybe this is the best Meta can do even benchmaxxing The impressive part is multimodality, very plausible since there's le
68.
by conradkay 6mo ago
I don't think any human would make that table in the middle
69.
by conradkay 6mo ago
I guess so, but there's a ton of buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the wild, and ostensibly it wasn't detected by static analysis The red team post goes over some more impressive finds, and says that there's hundreds more th
70.
by conradkay 6mo ago
From the red team post https://red.anthropic.com/2026/mythos-preview/ "Most security tooling has historically benefitted defenders more than attackers. When the first software fuzzers were deployed at large s
71.
by conradkay 6mo ago
Well, in a slightly indirect manner. Claude is writing a ton of code, and therefore creating a lot of security vulnerabilities.
72.
by conradkay 6mo ago
For what it's worth Anthropic explicity denies that. "To state it plainly: We never reduce model quality due to demand, time of day, or server load" Also can see https://marginlab.ai/trackers/claude-code&
73.
by conradkay 6mo ago
That generally makes sense to me, but I wonder if it's different when the attacker and defender are using the same tool (Mythos in this case) Maybe you just spend more on tokens by some factor than the attackers do combined, and end up
74.
by conradkay 6mo ago
Going off the recent biography of Demis Hassabis (CEO/co-founder of Deepmind, jointly won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry) it seems like he's very concerned about it as well
75.
by conradkay 6mo ago
I would've basically agreed with you until I'd seen this talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sd26pWhfmg Maybe a bad example since Nicholas works at Anthropic, but they're very accomplished and I doubt they
76.
by conradkay 6mo ago
permanent underclass has arrived :(
77.
by conradkay 6mo ago
For comparison, 5x the cost of Opus 4.6, and 1.67x for Opus 4.1 I think this would be very heavily used if they released it, completely unlike GPT 4.5
78.
by conradkay 6mo ago
Plausibly now. "As we wrote in the Project Glasswing announcement, we do not plan to make Mythos Preview generally available"
79.
by conradkay 7mo ago
Not really, there's camoufox but the vast majority use modified chrome/chromium
80.
by conradkay 7mo ago
He said that LLMs wouldn't have common sense about how the real world physically works, because it's so obvious to humans that we don't bother putting it into text. This seems pretty foolish honestly given the scale of intern
81.
by conradkay 7mo ago
I'm not fan of Altman but the financial angle doesn't make much sense when he doesn't have equity in OpenAI There's some indirect exposure and potential of being granted significant equity, but his actions don't rea
82.
by conradkay 7mo ago
I was basing it off my recollection of this: https://www.anthropic.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww-... basically 9/13 are very close
83.
by conradkay 7mo ago
General consensus seems to be that it's still a better coding model, overall
84.
by conradkay 7mo ago
Sonnet was pretty close to (or better than) Opus in a lot of benchmarks, I don't think it's a big deal
85.
by conradkay 8mo ago
It seems like all you have to do is paste 2-3 prompts
86.
by conradkay 8mo ago
Projects are here: https://codeberg.org/lucidrains From his description: "Github suspended my account without warning or reason, so here for the duration"
87.
by conradkay 8mo ago
Top LLMs are still very bad at poker, see this breakdown of a recent Kaggle experiment: < https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyv1bv7JKIQ > What do you mean by sweep training here?
88.
by conradkay 9mo ago
My guess would be that performance improvements (mostly hardware from Moore's law and the proliferation of SSDs, but also SQLite itself) have led to far fewer websites needing to run on more than 1 computer, and most are fine on a $5
89.
by conradkay 9mo ago
I think in the past it was more obvious. Rails switched to SQLite as the default somewhat recently
90.
by conradkay 9mo ago
I'd imagine that's it. With WAL you can probably hit >1000 writes a second

More ›