conductr

21 ms·

421.
by conductr 8mo ago
I think it would devolve quickly and probably super markets would fall first, but let’s not pretend like you know exactly how it would play out after that. I live in a large metro and super markets run empty a few times a year (usually weat
422.
by conductr 8mo ago
Covid shutdown should have killed our economy, nothing short of government spending prevented otherwise. So many people in the US live a paycheck to paycheck lifestyle, that the covid lockdowns without government spending would have likely
423.
by conductr 8mo ago
You can’t be silly enough to build a product that enables things like mass surveillance to proliferate and then try to take a stance of “please don’t use it like that”. You invented a genie and let him out of the bottle.
424.
by conductr 8mo ago
That’s fair. I do think they’re some point where it gets too broad though. The definition part will be a tough balancing. As an example, I’ve been a fairly strict parent with devices and content access. But, I do let my son play Switch game
425.
by conductr 8mo ago
> There would be no reason to state disagreement unless they thought it was a threat. No reason to do any of it other than you want to. But, because some broadcasters will want to signal to their audience there is a difference between co
426.
by conductr 8mo ago
American's like to romanticize outlaw types of all origins
427.
by conductr 8mo ago
I don't get your point, at least not in relation to the GP post. I agree with GP, parents need to be more accountable. We as parents, and We should all be concerned about future children/generations , should be demanding more reg
428.
by conductr 8mo ago
We all participate in this system through, most of “us” passively. Use the normal means to enact the change you want to see
429.
by conductr 8mo ago
That’s a separate issue from where the already paid tariffs should go
430.
by conductr 8mo ago
I’m a cynical person but this is a reach. There’s a huge gap between what this is and how I interpret “mandatory”. There’s nothing even punitive being discussed. They’re free to meet their public interest obligations the normal way as well
431.
by conductr 8mo ago
His brother-in-law is a prison guard. Just kidding but would anyone be surprised?
432.
by conductr 8mo ago
Personally think it should not get refunded. There’s no sane way to get it back to its source. And no one group should be making profit from it. Best if it stays with the government like a federal forfeiture so in theory we all benefit from
433.
by conductr 8mo ago
Not how they make them, as in who is responsible within their government or whatever the might have
434.
by conductr 8mo ago
It’s pretty common of regulators to ask things of those they regulate. CMS asks for input regarding healthcare changes, EPA asks for input on new standards, and so one. Is there some impression that regulators just blindly bark orders and a
435.
by conductr 8mo ago
Nothing mandatory, so no worries
436.
by conductr 8mo ago
Ah got it, thanks a ton for the feedback! I suppose that’s helpful but not too different than using Google. There’s a ton of chart types that aren’t native that I need to create and so usually just google for specifics, it’s not always som
437.
by conductr 8mo ago
I think it just throws the most engaging content at you hoping you get lured into using it more then the algo will update once it sees how you behave. For me, it's almost all thirst traps for several years. More recently it learned tha
438.
by conductr 8mo ago
I believe as a US citizen I have no say in how they make these decisions so this thought exercise is pointless. We all structure our governments differently and so compete globally with differing rules, I only care about how we do it here i
439.
by conductr 8mo ago
I think a lot of time Congress being stuck is a feature, not a bug. What happens when things aren't stuck, they change too much, in both frequency and magnitude. Kind of like when one person in the executive branch gets to make the rul
440.
by conductr 8mo ago
Question. Does this help actually build with excel or just analyze what data is in excel? For example, “build a Gantt chart base on … and suggest a the best layout for the data to drive the chart.” Gets me no where with copilot but it alway
441.
by conductr 8mo ago
> merely being very irritating is not an adequate reason to ban something I think we're talking about it's large scale impact on youth mental health, slightly more reason than 'merely...irritating' I do think it'
442.
by conductr 8mo ago
It seems efficient and simple that way. But you don't want federal politics playing that much of a part of your local life. And you don't want your local politicians to have to pander to the federal levels just to get what they ne
443.
by conductr 8mo ago
I tend to agree with this. The logic should be the same with different rate tables for each taxing body. What I don't want though is the Fed govt being the collector and distributor of all the funds. They already weld too much power wi
444.
by conductr 8mo ago
Captured revenue : cost to capture (could be an audit, billing for interest/fees due, etc. lots of avenues to capture revenue that is being missed). The problem is these metrics aren't really scalable productivity metrics. If you
445.
by conductr 8mo ago
I have children and don’t work in tech, I was able to self moderate myself and keep kids away from it. It’s simply not that hard to see it for what it is, and never has been. It’s bad. Glad people are finally seeing what’s obvious. Takes so
446.
by conductr 8mo ago
It’s how people unwind from stressful day, just like doomscrolling. But most of these people aren’t considered alcoholics by society, it’s fairly normal behavior until it affects other parts of your life. From what I can tell anyways. I als
447.
by conductr 8mo ago
If we feel these are comparable items, then we should treat social media like we treat fentanyl. Not the other way around. I’m not saying they’re similar though. But you used an extreme analogy and took it the wrong way.
448.
by conductr 8mo ago
I must just lack empathy then. I feel it’s zucks role to build the best wine, whisky, casino game, meth, cigar, etc he can. It’s the consumers job to use it responsibly. They won’t so that’s when it’s time for regulation. Which is probably
449.
by conductr 8mo ago
I disagree with first point but fully agree with latter. Probably why latter should be the initiative of these 18 wellbeing experts just like how we have with drugs, gambling, tobacco, alcohol. Not by changing the product but by restricting
450.
by conductr 8mo ago
Then ban social media as a whole, cherry picking features to ban is silly. Banning features that only harm young users that probably shouldn’t even be using the app due to their age is misguided. If it’s unhealthy for kids, ban kids use.

More ›