Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
concreteblock
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
concreteblock
5y ago
The problem seems to have the same flavor as the Collatz conjecture. Simple dynamical system - very difficult to tell what happens in the long run. Perhaps these things are too hard for (human) mathematics. I wonder if anyone has proved any
32.
▲
by
concreteblock
5y ago
In case anyone is wondering, the way to interpet the rules is as follows. * The state of the system is a black-white assignment of colors to the grid. * The rules tell you how to compute the next state of the system. * To update the state a
33.
▲
by
concreteblock
5y ago
Choosing to allocate most of your net worth in, e.g. cash, is a gamble too.
34.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
Many problems can be reduced to graph coloring problems if you look at it the right way. Try understanding the standard examples (see the applications section in Wikipedia), then it is really easy to come up with your own applications.
35.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
I agree with the first 3 statements. Just to confirm, I am using 'almost surely' in the technical sense, which means 'with probability 1.' Consider the following statement: If you keep flipping a fair coin every day, it
36.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
You’re right. I made a mistake - I thought you were trying to contradict the theorem I stated. I’ve just realized you were saying something orthogonal. As for the proof of my theorem, By taking logarithms, the process becomes an additive ra
37.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
The mean converges exponentially to zero with time. It doesn’t grow exponentially. So the theorem you cited also goes in the same direction of my statement.
38.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
No matter how many test subjects you use, if you run the experiment for a very long time, everyone goes bankrupt and will never recover. More precisely there is a finite time after which no-one ever passes above $0.0000000000000001. That is
39.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
> I'd expect many candidates to think that you actually want them to generate all the permutations and then get bogged down in recursion. Ideally the candidate should realize that this is computationally infeasible and quickly come
40.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
Some things can't be measured.
41.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
Do you have an actual argument or are you just going to nitpick word choices?
42.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
Curious, who drilled it into your head? Were you/are you a quant? I see the 'house money' fallacy all the time (most commonly in the context of 'take out your initial investment').
43.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
A bit depressing to be an advertising, I think.
44.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
Those who did poorly at school, love to use this trite cliche. Even when we're not even talking about teachers.
45.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
I did read the thread. Someone was saying how whiteboard prompts are scary and has a high false negative rate. You took that and turned it into "if you find interviews scary, that's a signal that you have unreasonable social skill
46.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
Sounds like stress doesn't impact you, even in interview settings. Good for you! Too bad it seems like you also lack the empathy to see why other people might find interviews different from normal work-collaboration duties. And no, it&
47.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
Very interesting. Do you have any suggestions for reading more about this? "It is actually one of the nice facts of life that as you dial up the local instability of a dynamical system you get a corresponding increase in the statistica
48.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
Feynman was brilliant but I don't think his skepticism of formailty sets him aparts from other good mathematicians or even a typical good mathematics student. https://terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/theres-mor
49.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
Can you explain why the lawyers needed mirror sites? Does mirroring a site mean making a local copy of it?
50.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
And then some other guy will object to your use of 'precise' or 'exact'. Just read the definition and move on.
51.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
> For a user named ketamine_ are you really questioning the well known efficacy of few-shot therapies for treatment resistant depression and PTSD? Maybe they want to convince their friends?
52.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
You're right. I was 100% thinking of 'stat arb' when I wrote that comment. What I meant to say that the way 'arb' is used is completely meaningless. Maybe a clearer comment would have been: "If rentech's s
53.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
2. No strategy can scale indefinitely. 3. Every strategy can be viewed as a sort of 'arbitrage'. 4. Applies to every strategy.
54.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
According to wikipedia, "From his two known interviews, it is known that: Mini-Microsoft is male (reported in both interviews). He is married (reported in both interviews and occasionally referred to on the site). At least one co-worke
55.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
Someone said, roughly, that X should be like Y. You immediately asked them why this was ethically optimal. To me that seems like a non-sequiter. There is no reason to suspect that the optimization (with respect to whatever objective you des
56.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
Why did you automatically bring "ethics" into this discussion? The person you replied to was probably using the word 'should' in reference to some other objective.
57.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
That's because (imo) numbers aren't intrinsic to the physical universe. They are (imo) an abstraction we humans invented to describe certain phenomena. You may not agree but hopefully you can at least see why some people would hav
58.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
In your opinion, what are the important 'soft skills' that 1) Academics lack 2) Are hard to pick up E.g. another commenter mentioned Git. Many academics don't use version control, but I think learning how to do this to an acc
59.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
I don't think it's fair to characterize such people as "incapable of learning how to do new things" if they're not even being given the opportunity to learn. I'm not saying that the OP should hire these people,
60.
▲
by
concreteblock
6y ago
That's a good point about the linguisitic connotations. faitswulff's comment reads so much better to me when you just replace the word 'privilege' with 'virtuous cycle' or 'snowball effect'.
More ›