conartist6

5 ms·

61.
by conartist6 2mo ago
> Before posting on PubPeer, Shane spoke to the authors directly to alert them of his concerns and request the data—the 2021 article has a data sharing agreement—but they denied his request because he was critical of their work. What lit
62.
by conartist6 2mo ago
On the lack thereof
63.
by conartist6 2mo ago
Sure, but that's a big big big big big big big big big big "if". All AI has really succeeding in proving so far is that humans CAN really, very much "keep up", despite repeated repeated repeated repeated assertions
64.
by conartist6 2mo ago
I couldn't be happier that people are mad about it. To quote Calvin, "nothing helps a bad mood like spreading it around"
65.
by conartist6 2mo ago
This is going to be how I write my resume now: how many billion parameters of knowledge I have on each topic
66.
by conartist6 2mo ago
The underlying property is called "chirality" and describes why a left glove and a right glove are meaningfully different from each other even though they have the same topology. Many things can have chirality: big things like glo
67.
by conartist6 2mo ago
Where they created value wasn't just the CRUD app but developing their skills, supporting communities that asked and answered questions to build public knowledgebases. They adapted to painfully repetitive tasks by developing tools that
68.
by conartist6 2mo ago
I'm with you except that the economy will crash when it turns out everyone stopped creating real value. ...and in the mean time every real product I have to use is getting worse.
69.
by conartist6 2mo ago
Of course. You've described a company with no team . What you've said also makes clear why nobody would have an incentive to play like a team player. You have this comprehension work you think is important and you've already
70.
by conartist6 2mo ago
That's so depressing, and a real loss for your employer. Even if they neither know nor care that you are now sandbagging them, you still are. You aren't making real gains because you're tossing out value of equivalent or grea
71.
by conartist6 2mo ago
An equalizer, yes. They lift up those with little skill, and they drag down the top talent. This is a practical effect by which top talent is neutralized. Where they should lead people, they talk to models instead. ...now you have a generat
72.
by conartist6 2mo ago
Why are LLM users such poor leaders then? To go anywhere serious you have to lead people, but even the ones who should be leading people are heads down talking to the LLM
73.
by conartist6 2mo ago
Should open up some jobs currently held by unscrupulous people as well ; )
74.
by conartist6 2mo ago
Remember kids, if you say "I was doing it for AI", it's legal. If you say "I was doing it for the good of humanity," well, we still remember Aaron Swartz. But of course, unlike humanity, AI is really worth it!
75.
by conartist6 2mo ago
Nice work, well done!
76.
by conartist6 2mo ago
It doesn't cost you $80 a month, it costs you your creativity first and then your reputation
77.
by conartist6 2mo ago
Yep. I got that. I think that set of technical choices gives a pretty good range of UX choices
78.
by conartist6 2mo ago
It's really pretty much just the model used by git and github.
79.
by conartist6 2mo ago
They got the broadest strokes if the idea right-ish, but most of the specifics are wrong
80.
by conartist6 2mo ago
I love this! Would be interested in collaborating potentially
81.
by conartist6 2mo ago
You think nobody found them interesting enough to study when they were being made into hats? It's hard to raise the alarm about a harm that has not yet come to pass
82.
by conartist6 2mo ago
May they all lose their jobs
83.
by conartist6 2mo ago
Perhaps it's only because we wiped them out so many places that we understand in the slightest the ecological role they play
84.
by conartist6 2mo ago
Well i have a really powerful model implanted right into my skull. When a model is so convenient, and even free to use, you'll find that you use it all the time I think
85.
by conartist6 2mo ago
That's the thing: even if you don't use AI, if most of what you read is AI, soon this is what you'll sound like, just because it's so much of the training data your own brain's model has. Using it slowly sucks the
86.
by conartist6 2mo ago
I'm just beyond thrilled that it's actually starting to be a public embarrassment to cough up a glob of AI text.
87.
by conartist6 2mo ago
This feels like a precursor to the project I'm doing, which I us to make an editor whose state and output are expressed as such "pre-parsed" syntax trees. I'm trying to make mine fully language agnostic though
88.
by conartist6 2mo ago
Yeah no it's no mistake. Zed functions like a closed product despite being an open one, especially since users aren't free to iterate on usability as they are when the IDE UI is styled with CSS. VSCode is benefiting from mounds of
89.
by conartist6 2mo ago
I'll just drop this here for you and anyone else who wants it: https://github.com/bablr-lang/language-en-regex-vm-pattern/b... No codegen, just function calling.
90.
by conartist6 2mo ago
yes

More ›