Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
computerbuster
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
computerbuster
3y ago
And they are all not competitive with Apple Silicon. What's your point?
62.
▲
by
computerbuster
3y ago
No it isn't. It is M2 based
63.
▲
by
computerbuster
3y ago
mozjpeg automatically handles chroma subsampling, scaling up from 4:2:0 to 4:2:2 & then 4:4:4. WebP is 4:2:0 only, AVIF is 4:4:4 only (as tested) & I believe JXL doesn't subsample at all.
64.
▲
XYB JPEG: Perceptual Color Encoding Tested
(giannirosato.com)
49 points
by
computerbuster
3y ago
|
44 comments
65.
▲
by
computerbuster
3y ago
How does the new cjpegli encoder using the XYB color space stack up compared to the competition?
66.
▲
Jpegli: A New JPEG Encoder
(giannirosato.com)
7 points
by
computerbuster
3y ago
|
4 comments
67.
▲
by
computerbuster
3y ago
From libjpeg to libjpeg-turbo, then mozjpeg, and now jpegli, is this another great leap forward in coding efficiency? Jpegli compared to mozjpeg, WebP, AVIF & JXL.
68.
▲
by
computerbuster
3y ago
It can be, but not perfectly. Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/jxl/?utm_sour... Chrome: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/add-jxl-support/kh.
69.
▲
by
computerbuster
3y ago
https://giannirosato.com/blog/post/nvenc-v-qsv/ This site has WASM-decoded JXL images using JXL.js. Native support would be much faster, & trying to decode much larger images with JXL.js doesn’t work very
70.
▲
A Defense of Text-Speak
(nateranda.com)
45 points
by
computerbuster
3y ago
|
20 comments
71.
▲
by
computerbuster
3y ago
You're right, I should look into this. Thanks for linking.
72.
▲
Nvenc vs. QSV: Who Has the Best Hardware AV1 Encoder?
(giannirosato.com)
70 points
by
computerbuster
3y ago
|
42 comments
73.
▲
by
computerbuster
3y ago
Using SSIMULACRA2, I've compared Intel's QuickSync Video to Nvidia's NVENC encoder across Linux & Windows. They compete against other dedicated encoding hardware for different codecs across different GPUs, including an In
74.
▲
by
computerbuster
4y ago
I think the most interesting takeaway here is that while JXL continues to face unfair treatment from web browser vendors, jpegli is a really fascinating development that performs very closely to AVIF at high quality in the dataset. I'd
75.
▲
by
computerbuster
4y ago
As I mentioned in the article, Thorium is a Chromium-based browser that fully supports JPEG-XL. Here's the libjxl patch that can be ported to other Chromium-based browsers: https://github.com/Alex313031/thorium-lib
76.
▲
by
computerbuster
4y ago
You're probably right that I shouldn't have been so rash, I'm sorry for the omission & my despondent attitude toward HEIC. My enthusiasm is sullied by the presence of royalties & a non-existent web presence because of
77.
▲
JPEG-XL vs. AVIF and Others: 27 Images Compared
(giannirosato.com)
156 points
by
computerbuster
4y ago
|
112 comments
78.
▲
Manjaro let their certificate expire, again
(github.com)
2 points
by
computerbuster
4y ago
|
0 comments