Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
compbio
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
compbio
11y ago
Agile done wrong destroys more than Agile done right can fix. If you feel too good, or too senior for a programming methodology like Agile, then you are bound to not like it. Is that a fault with Agile, or a fault with your attitude? A cowb
62.
▲
by
compbio
11y ago
> If I have a pain in my lower right abdomen and I poll the human population, I'm going to get a better answer than a doctor? You could. It is why people prefer a second opinion even when dealing with an expert. There are programs w
63.
▲
by
compbio
11y ago
Slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13gDspOfYxB3z2_SIKne0... Blog: https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/lessons-from-early-days-of-go...
64.
▲
Lessons learned from the early days of Google [video]
(youtube.com)
45 points
by
compbio
11y ago
|
4 comments
65.
▲
by
compbio
11y ago
I do not think logic-based learning is dead. It just smells a bit funny. In the vein of the papers "From machine learning to machine reasoning" and "Text understanding from scratch" I expect a "First-order logic und
66.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
I think those quotes were a bit snotty, especially considering your stature and knowledge on this. I don't think I was trying to rebut you, as much as I was simply trying my luck at advocating that user's view. Sorry for that.
67.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
I do not think there is a one-to-one connection to be made between neural nets and the brain. That said, it is possible to fool our own visual system in a similar way: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestalt_psychology#Pro
68.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
But maybe what they did today makes that impossible. They set the whole thing on fire, and now maybe nobody is going to trust it because they’ll think there’s some big evil vulnerability in the code. But now this decision makes me feel lik
69.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
As far as I can gather the Dutch authorities are not able to retrieve TrueCrypt keys. I can not say the same about BitLocker and FileVault. If the US knows how to get into TrueCrypt volumes then at least they are not sharing that knowledge
70.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
Original article: http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.nl/2015/03/out-with-unw...
71.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
Do not be silly. Turning a bug like this into a commercial venture? How do you find customers fast enough before a patch? 6337$ for a days work is very reasonable, while selling a bug like this makes you not worthy of a quarter.
72.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
I now think Facebook is going to give us Artificial Facebook friends. Modeled on your interactions with your Facebook contacts, combined with the data of a million other connections, it will be more attentive, always available, knows just h
73.
▲
DataTau: A Hacker News for Data Scientists
(datatau.com)
15 points
by
compbio
12y ago
|
0 comments
74.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
Very interesting. Thank you for correcting me. a relatively large fraction of examples will be misclassified by networks trained from scratch with different hyper-parameters (number of layers, regularization or initial weights). The above
75.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
I was not talking about overfitting. I've seen that paper. The original paper asked if images that could fool DBN.a could fool DBN.b. The answer was: certainly not all the time. They used the exact same train set and architecture for D
76.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
Deep nets are only loosely inspired by neurobiology. That's why LeCun calls them "convolutional nets" and not "convolutional neural nets" and prefers "nodes" over "neurons". It is, however, possi
77.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
Now I have to try this out. My intuition tells me it becomes increasingly hard to create a fooling image, which looks alien, and is able to fool all the nets in the ensemble, even though they have different settings and params. I think they
78.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
If we have a singularity AI then we don't need CAPTCHAs: For all intents and purposes an AI is equal or superior to humans, there is no distinction to be made. The Turing Test is a form of CAPTCHA. Also, one could make CAPTCHA's i
79.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
It is good to know that they need access to a lot of predictions from a net, before they can create an image that will "fool" the net, but look alien to humans. Secondly, this doesn't account for ensembling: "fool me onc
80.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~clegoues/docs/legoues-icse09.pdf "Automatically Finding Patches Using Genetic Programming ... We introduce a fully automated method for locating and repairing bugs in software" ht
81.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
I saw Wikipedia grow from a playful listing of facts and "did you know?"'s to what it is today. I came to rely on the Wikipedia facts and trust was very high. It took joining and partaking in the creation of a "political
82.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
It is useful to look at countries which require that you identify yourself if you want to sell stuff online. For commercial sites in Germany a "Web Imprint" (Impressum) is required by law. This "Web Imprint" has to be on
83.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
"Earlier this week, we reported a glitch in Google Search, where clicking on a link after a search for Gmail listed someone’s email address, complete in a window ready to send them email. With today’s Gmail outage, that error — never f
84.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
HN does not allow to give hat-tips or other Twitter-like credits. Where should they even put that? In the title? It is: first come-first serve and I don't think you can even mention the OP of this post without scrolling back and lookin
85.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
I was hoping the challenges would include machine learning. There is so much exciting overlap between ML and security. From detecting intrusion attempts to scraping and processing pastebins. I think it is amazing what you guys did here: you
86.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
Then he can wait for the RNG to produce this same random data. Eventually it will produce a file which matches. A dynamic solution of sorts, because he would have to be quick to diff, before the file starts changing again. I feel that the c
87.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
Yes, if you want to be sure that your solution is correct, you must run the compressor yourself. Then you count the number of collisions it takes to happen upon the correct solution and feed this counter to your decompressor. But then you p
88.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
Blast! That would require our solution to break all known encryption. Then it would be easier to just target Goldman's setup. A file with output from AES-256("sekrit") would not be random to Goldman. It would appear random to
89.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
Chances of getting a collision is higher than getting a good solution, but having multiple hashes does help in increasing the chance at a good solution. With a hash 1 bit less than the length of the file, we put two pigeons inside one hole,
90.
▲
by
compbio
12y ago
A trick similar to the recursive Barf compressor (add information to the filename). http://mattmahoney.net/dc/barf.html A longer running challenge is http://www.drdobbs.com/architecture-and-design/
More ›