comboy

6 ms·

91.
by comboy 6mo ago
Mostly datasets but who knows if LLMs stuff also if I'm creating a datasets with them[0]. Long story short it's a potential headache, don't want that headache for now. Plus basically two options after open sourcing: people ar
92.
by comboy 6mo ago
Only about 5K explanations now I'm still trying to polish the pipeline before covering more. Due to all these verification and associated regenerations the cost is quite high. It's not opon source but it is completely free. Open s
93.
by comboy 6mo ago
Great minds think alike :D https://hanzirama.com/character/%E5%AD%A6 It is also allowing me to see all relevant associations easily when revealing the card in built in SRS, you add cards to SRS as you browse, so they a
94.
by comboy 6mo ago
From my experience, saying "this is not X, it will be not used for Y" is vastly increasing chances of this being classified as being X. Anybody can write "this is authorized research". Instead use something like evaluate
95.
by comboy 6mo ago
Tried antigravity and cli a few times. I'm unable to handle that prodigious toddler. Are you guys able to make use of it?
96.
by comboy 6mo ago
I mean, yes but LLMs have been making me more cognitively active. I've learned how to do more stuff that I would have without them and it's a decent multiplier not some rounding error. Obviously you can have a plumber that knows h
97.
by comboy 6mo ago
I think API is fine, likely only subscription is affected. Not to mention trivial heuristics to differentiate repeated API calls / same data and potential CLI usage although that would be true malice. It seemed to me that it was perfor
98.
by comboy 6mo ago
Pretty reassuring to hear that. I was skeptical too, there's a lot of variables like some crap added to memory specific skill or custom instructions interfering with the workflow and what not. But now it was like a toddler that consume
99.
by comboy 6mo ago
We are sorry, but your print resembles random princess from Disney too much (actually, we won't tell you which). Just following the law you know..
100.
by comboy 6mo ago
Unrelated, but Claude was performing so tragically last few days, maybe week(s), but days mostly, that I had to reluctantly switch. Reluctantly because I enjoy it. Even the most basic stuff, like most python scripts it has to rerun because
101.
by comboy 6mo ago
I have the same bias as the parent. I'd rather pay $50 one time than $9 a year even if I throw it away after 4 years. But the main reason I wouldn't install it despite being happy customizing linux is that it's yet another bl
102.
by comboy 6mo ago
To be fair, I can do 3 balls effortlessly, but I can't do 1 ball like it is in this description, I just have a lot of error correction, enough to do it pretty much indefinitely. But I cannot reliably throw it accurately to the other ha
103.
by comboy 6mo ago
You just convinced me to try it. Claude just copy pastes, does search and replace, zero abstractions and I'm the one that needs to think about the edge cases.
104.
by comboy 6mo ago
Any good reasonable alternatives? Gemini is like prodigious 3yo hopeless for my projects, anybody tested some opencode with kimi or something?
105.
by comboy 6mo ago
Interesting that in Chinese, classical writing is associated with terseness. That definitely wouldn't work that way in other languages I know.
106.
by comboy 6mo ago
It's not a well-written book. It's an interesting book (more like a story).
107.
by comboy 6mo ago
Program defines the exact computer instructions. Most of the time you don't care about that level of detail. You just have some intent and some constraints. Say "I want HN client for mobile", "must notify me about commen
108.
by comboy 6mo ago
The spec manually crafted the user is ideal. It's just that we're lazy. After being able to chat, I don't see people going back. You can't just paste some error into the specs, you can't paste it image and say it ma
109.
by comboy 6mo ago
Hey, you seem to have similar view on this. I know ideas are cheap but hear me out: You talk with agent A it only modifies this spec, you still chat and can say "make it prettier" but that agent only modifies the spec, the spec co
110.
by comboy 6mo ago
GPUs can do graphics too?
111.
by comboy 6mo ago
It's hard to tell how much it says about difficulty of harnessing vs how much it says about difficulty of maintaining a clean and not bloated codebase when coding with AI.
112.
by comboy 6mo ago
I mean, tools change, but I'd be happy to hear if any tool can create that by just saying create "Claude Code Unpack" with nice graphics. or some other single prompt. It likely was an iterative process and it would be lovely
113.
by comboy 6mo ago
As things stand today even when doing research tasks, time spent by model is >> than fetching websites. I don't see it changing any time soon, except when some deals happen behind the scenes where agents get to access CF guarded
114.
by comboy 6mo ago
Add CI to check if new laws don't contradict with any existing ones.
115.
by comboy 6mo ago
*that we know of
116.
by comboy 6mo ago
Haha, here's some random AI generated content: At least 225 judges have ruled in more than 700 cases that the administration's mandatory immigration detention policy likely violates the right to due process[1] The Fifth Amen
117.
by comboy 6mo ago
Yeah, good tests are associated with cost. I'd like to see benchmarks on big messy codebases and how models perform on a clearly defined task that's easy to verify. I was thinking that tokens spent in such case could also be an in
118.
by comboy 6mo ago
Not really related, but does anybody know if somebody's tracking same models performance on some benchmarks over time? Sometimes I feel like I'm being A/B tested.
119.
by comboy 6mo ago
People are loading huge interpreted environments for stuff that can be done from the command line. Run computations on complex objects where it could be a single machine instruction etc. The trend has been around for a long time.
120.
by comboy 6mo ago
lol, yeah > We’ve rewritten Claude Code’s terminal rendering system to reduce flickering by roughly 85%. tells you all you need to know and I keep running it remotely through tmux, that explains so many things edit: if they are writing i

More ›