combataircraft

10 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by combataircraft 14y ago

   Github is not a rich web app for me. See Google Spreadsheets to figure out what a client-side framework should be helpful for.
2. 62.▲
   by combataircraft 14y ago

   What the fuck is going to happen when I need to reuse my JavaScript code on a different platform e.g NodeJS, vert.x etc? I'm sorry for negative comments but, what ruby and .net communities produce for JS is shit. It's even more harmful then
3. 63.▲
   by combataircraft 14y ago

   yeah yeah, that's what javascript needs! let's make all your javascript code more non-reusable.
4. 64.▲
   Highkick: a minimalistic testing tool for NodeJS developers(github.com)

   2 points by combataircraft 14y ago|0 comments
5. 65.▲
   StoneTunnel: A JavaScript Library to Simplify LRU Caching(github.com)

   2 points by combataircraft 14y ago|0 comments
6. 66.▲
   Boxcars: A tiny JavaScript library for fetching resources on NodeJS and browsers(github.com)

   2 points by combataircraft 14y ago|0 comments
7. 67.▲
   by combataircraft 14y ago

   Here are the core modules it supports; http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3915403 browserify-http can be used by OneJS as well but I don't see any point of emulating http module on client-side. I prefer using libraries supporting both pl
8. 68.▲
   by combataircraft 14y ago

   Consider OneJS here; http://github.com/azer/onejs see my comment above for details about the differences; http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3915403
9. 69.▲
   by combataircraft 14y ago

   RequireJS is very expensive and it's NOT CommonJS. It claims that CommonJS is not-optimal for browser and offers you to put your source code inside of an awkward container for optimizing. It's not smart. Let me introduce you OneJS: http://
10. 70.▲
    Functools.js(github.com)

    3 points by combataircraft 14y ago|0 comments
11. 71.▲
    by combataircraft 14y ago

    although onejs and browserify tries to accomplish similar tasks, onejs has some noticeable implementation and concept differences (e.g browserify pollutes global scope a lot and it expects you to provide it a main module instead of a packag
12. 72.▲
    by combataircraft 14y ago

    FOA, "using same code" means "sharing same source code in all JS environments" in this context. "Proxying some server-side JS code to client-side" is totally irrelevant to this topic, as you pointed. And here are the differences of OneJS:
13. 73.▲
    by combataircraft 14y ago

    A bundle file OneJS generates contains only a tiny CommonJS implementation and a simple "process" object ( use "--noprocess" option if not needed). You can browse them here; https://github.com/azer/onejs/tree/master/templates It doesn't c
14. 74.▲
    OneJS lets coders convert NodeJS projects into single, stand-alone files(github.com)

    47 points by combataircraft 14y ago|9 comments
15. 75.▲
    by combataircraft 15y ago

    I'm sick of this kind of gay dramas. A political conversation between two JavaScript coders shouldn't be exposed like this. It's not related to JavaScript :)
16. 76.▲
    by combataircraft 15y ago

    https://github.com/visionmedia/superagent
17. 77.▲
    by combataircraft 15y ago

    @silvart19, I was talking about EmberJS' bindings. That's what makes Ember apps crappy. For the mention of MVC, you don't need to use a framework that forces you to live in North Korea.
18. 78.▲
    by combataircraft 15y ago

    I'm very happy and satisfied with my current development kits and methodology. I use no framework and don't write any classes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_programming
19. 79.▲
    by combataircraft 15y ago

    I prefer teaching beginners the JavaScript way of doing things instead of forcing them to write spaghetti code.
20. 80.▲
    by combataircraft 15y ago

    Better solutions are already provided by JavaScript itself. Event-driven programming was the idiomatic solution until CPS became the one everybody follows with the grow of NodeJS. See how NodeJS community deal with async programming.
21. 81.▲
    by combataircraft 15y ago

    Hey guys, please take a look at the following app: http://editgrid.com/untitled It's the coolest web-based spreadsheets application built 6 years ago using no library, no framework. I'm a fan of it. It was looking just like this current v
22. 82.▲
    Functional Way of Avoiding Nested Callbacks in JavaScript - Kodfabrik Blog(io.kodfabrik.com)

    2 points by combataircraft 15y ago|0 comments
23. 83.▲
    LowKick lets developers run JavaScript tests on command-line(github.com)

    2 points by combataircraft 15y ago|0 comments