coliveira

8 ms·

151.
by coliveira 8mo ago
> A future administration will need to purge all their companies Good luck, democrats will put some of that easy money on their pockets and look the other way, like they always did.
152.
by coliveira 8mo ago
That was always a lie. Gates became the richest pedo in the world building a monopoly of bad software and destroying other people's businesses. Since then things only got worse.
153.
by coliveira 8mo ago
That's very possible! In the last few days Anthropic was getting a lot of attention, and OpenAI was looking weaker in comparison. It seems like a politically coordinated job to remove competition.
154.
by coliveira 8mo ago
Very possible, double speaking is Sam Altman's specialty.
155.
by coliveira 8mo ago
At least I'm not getting my hands dirty.
156.
by coliveira 8mo ago
Only if you think that crime will somehow improve America. My opinion is that this is leading to its collapse, no matter how "powerful" they look.
157.
by coliveira 8mo ago
This is pretty much on the right take on it, although it's much more than that. It's very clear at this point, especially the first conclusion, but people insist in looking to the other side.
158.
by coliveira 8mo ago
Yes, what is implied in this episode is that all big companies that do AI development or provide computing for Ai are now signing for these very shady uses of their technologies.
159.
by coliveira 8mo ago
Yes, it is either a lie or an admission that OpenAI is a global surveillance mechanism.
160.
by coliveira 8mo ago
So, it seems they're openly admitting that OpenAI is a surveillance mechanism used at the discretion of the US gov.
161.
by coliveira 8mo ago
The reason this doesn't make sense is that this is the math of monopoly creation! The government should be making sure companies don't go around throwing money at circular deals that will make them and their friends a fortune whil
162.
by coliveira 8mo ago
It's like credit cards loaning money to people who are unemployed and will default on payments. It's a risky business that is legal and can be very profitable, but may also be disastrous in the future.
163.
by coliveira 8mo ago
This excerpt is demonstrating the use of a literary technique to write non-literary prose. It's an almost sure sign that an LLM is generating the text.
164.
by coliveira 8mo ago
If politicians did what was popular, the USA would have a public health system a long time ago. They just pretend and do things they're paid to support, that's it.
165.
by coliveira 8mo ago
They were able to slow down the inevitable trajectory, they did nothing to reverse course. Doing anything different would be too "radical" for Obama or Biden.
166.
by coliveira 8mo ago
This is what democrats and Hollywood are for. Some people still believe in them.
167.
by coliveira 8mo ago
You just don't have imagination. Google, just by itself, controls 89% of the traffic in the Internet. And we know that the government can get any information they want from them, without even asking too much. If you combine this with o
168.
by coliveira 8mo ago
You're right. It's fantastic to see how English comprehension is decaying, even in groups that supposedly are smarter than average. There's a fast decaying tendency in language comprehension overall, and I can only point to t
169.
by coliveira 8mo ago
He's taking Venezuela's oil money into accounts that he controls. Who knows what this money will be used for.
170.
by coliveira 8mo ago
They're just too busy repackaging the same spying tech on different channels and then selling that for billions in the US stock market. Also knowing that US regulators won't say a single word, because how could they ever say somet
171.
by coliveira 8mo ago
No, we know very well how they operate. They're paid to get all kinds of sensitive information from governments and other institutions around the world and store it in their very "secure" data centers. Once there, the US gove
172.
by coliveira 8mo ago
They don't need a backdoor, the whole company is a backdoor receiving sensitive information from governments 24x7.
173.
by coliveira 8mo ago
They figured out that if the government does something it is opposed by a lot of people. But if a company says they'll collect information from every single customer in exchange for some worthless token, people will willingly provide a
174.
by coliveira 8mo ago
I'm technical, and I use AI tools but only for basic technical tasks such as finding information, summarizing simple topics, etc. For everything else AI is too inconsistent/inconvenient/unnatural. While it works fine as a dem
175.
by coliveira 8mo ago
Then he should be prepared to spend the rest of his life in jail.
176.
by coliveira 8mo ago
The right way to look at these networks is that people are being trained by the algorithm, not the other way around. The ultimate goal is to elicit behaviors in humans, normally to spend more time and spend more money in the platform, but a
177.
by coliveira 8mo ago
In the US it is now legal because it was completely taken over by the hydra.
178.
by coliveira 8mo ago
My observation is that all these services are exploding in complexity, and they justify saying that there are more features now, so everyone needs to accept spending more and more time and effort for the same results.
179.
by coliveira 8mo ago
The end result of all this is that the percentage of people who know how to implement systems without AWS/Azure will be a single digit. From that point on, this will be the only "economic" way, it doesn't matter what the
180.
by coliveira 8mo ago
Jeffrey Epstein's friend Elon Musk is trying to stop a financial disaster in xAi that would expose how irresponsible he is. He's gonna put all that in a company that has real money coming from government and soon will get retail i

More ›