coeneedell

10 ms·

61.
by coeneedell 4y ago
Haha yes I was thinking strategically alone in my own response to this anxiety. Assuming nuclear state A is willing to become a pariah state in exchange for destroying nuclear state B, the calculus still doesn’t make sense. I think you are
62.
by coeneedell 4y ago
I wouldn’t be worried about the major nuclear powers personally, since all their capabilities are no doubt properly shielded. Israel, Iran, India, Pakistan, maybe North Korea are worth worrying about, but their main targets would be equally
63.
by coeneedell 4y ago
https://www.adl.org/resources/tools-to-track-hate/antisemiti...
64.
by coeneedell 4y ago
It was just a plug-in for Glava ( https://github.com/jarcode-foss/glava ) not really worth sharing imo.
65.
by coeneedell 4y ago
Average is total divided by number of people. Therefore total is average times number of people.
66.
by coeneedell 4y ago
This is lovely, my friend. My own experience with shaders was in building a custom spectrum analyzer and I found it so very enriching and different from what I usually program (ML and Data pipelines). Really really nice work!
67.
by coeneedell 4y ago
It actually is a valid measure here because they’re using it to estimate total income.
68.
by coeneedell 4y ago
It absolutely is used in English, although not commonly, and it was more common in older texts. Nowadays it’s mostly used in proper nouns like Zoë, Chloë, and in some spellings of my own name, Coën.
69.
by coeneedell 4y ago
In older texts the notation appears on other words like coöperation. Some Americans use dieresis in their names as well (Zoë and Chloë are increasingly common for example). Furthermore the dieresis (trema in French) in naïf is doing the sam
70.
by coeneedell 4y ago
Are you personally offended by any of these words (except the ones that are obvious slurs, I mean)? I would love to hear a first person account, since they seem to be absent from this discussion.
71.
by coeneedell 4y ago
In this hypothetical we’re beyond negotiation anyway. I think I made this clear with the clause “in imminent danger of being killed”. If hostage negotiation were possible, that would not be imminent danger of being killed. I’m a member of a
72.
by coeneedell 4y ago
If I was being held hostage and in imminent danger of being killed, I would prefer an armed response.
73.
by coeneedell 4y ago
Reading through the suggestions a lot seem out of date, ignorant of the actual experience of people, and insufficiently justifies the change. It’s true that many of these things have been accepted by peer institutions but that was long ago
74.
by coeneedell 4y ago
Man that article devolved into antisemitic canards very quickly.
75.
by coeneedell 4y ago
Here’s the thing man. A lot of the papers coming out of top labs are written in just such a way that it’s hard to figure out exactly what they did, but not so hard that nobody can replicate it. They’ll share code once their papers are out.
76.
by coeneedell 4y ago
I don’t see how this is inconsistent with what they’re saying. These people are asking their colleges to not provide a platform, not that the speakers should not be allowed to speak anywhere.
77.
by coeneedell 4y ago
It’s not too different from “kettling” tactics.
78.
by coeneedell 4y ago
The “large number of people” could be a full on religious dogma, but it could also be a smallish cult out in the hinterlands.
79.
by coeneedell 4y ago
Not the person you replied to of course, but when I saw this the concept of mystery religions comes to mind for me. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greco-Roman_mysteries They were even widespread in the same region at
80.
by coeneedell 4y ago
Well okay, but when the scientific method produces knowledge, the voracity of that knowledge can be checked by an observer. When a mystic convinces a large number of people that their opinions are in fact, truths, that is not a process that
81.
by coeneedell 4y ago
Seeing the faces of three people doesn’t change the fact that it’s only three people.
82.
by coeneedell 4y ago
From my point of view, seeing you harass and troll people in this thread by constructing uncharitable straw men, then hawking an overpriced product, makes it seem like you’re trying to drum up anger, then profit off of it.
83.
by coeneedell 4y ago
It’s probably not a good sign for the future of hacker news that the all the real responses are sinking to the bottom of this comment-space and the top two comments are cynical anti-intellectual tirades.
84.
by coeneedell 5y ago
Are you trying to say that there's something inherent to the Jewish population that they're less likely to marry a non-Jewish person than a Muslim is to marry a non-Muslim?
85.
by coeneedell 5y ago
I don't think it's racist to be worried about a nuclear power colonizing its neighbors.
86.
by coeneedell 5y ago
Not the parent, but I have a thought on this. While workers would be able to prioritize things other than profit, I don't think they would. From an economics analysis, we're really just redefining profit as benefits to all corpora
87.
by coeneedell 5y ago
I've now read every comment in this thread and have not seen a single answer to the question: what happens in Europe if someone calls the police to report an active shooter incident? Can someone please answer this question in good fait
88.
Collaborative Filtering and Innovation: A Case Study from Steam Recommendations(coen.needell.co)
1 points by coeneedell 6y ago|0 comments
89.
by coeneedell 6y ago
So I grew up in Wenatchee, right across the river from East Wenatchee. I remember when this started in about 2016. I can't speak for east wenatchee but the downtown got a lot nicer, and people generally gut wealthier in Wenatchee. It c
90.
by coeneedell 6y ago
Unless Zuckerburg has a time machine I'd have to agree with you.

More ›