codygman

63 ms·

571.
by codygman 12y ago
I found myself using cabbage[0] so I could have exact version dependencies. Nix was awesome when mostly using latest versions of a package, but for much of my code I needed specific versions and cabbage allowed me to have them. 0: https:&#
572.
by codygman 12y ago
Cool! I guess my evaluation of Yi/vim emulation was more cosmetic than I thought :)
573.
by codygman 12y ago
Mind elaborating where you felt like things were being glossed over? Is glossing over things necessarily a bad thing? Isn't learnXinY just an introduction site? Have you tried the howistart[0] for Haskell? 0: http://howistar
574.
by codygman 12y ago
Care to elaborate on where it falls down emulating vim?
575.
by codygman 12y ago
> I was too shy to share it as it did not involve magic abstract Haskell-foo Please don't be, simple understandable Haskell code is very nice :) Plus if there is a better way of doing it you get to find that out too.
576.
by codygman 12y ago
> They just mean you don't have to write the very silly tests I have seen claims and have a hunch that more than just very silly tests can be eliminated by types, but I'm struggling to come up with or remember any examples. I&#
577.
by codygman 12y ago
complicated is a very overloaded term, you'll have to communicate what complicated is to you before we can meaningfully compare Haskell vs other ML family.
578.
by codygman 12y ago
Great comments and better bug reports, just want to mention it actually says to always re-use Session in the wreq tutorial[0]. Perhaps it should be stated more prominently, repeated, or even both. For non-trivial applications, we’ll a
579.
by codygman 12y ago
Why would there be a book on neovim? It's just vim with a different plugin system allowing you to create plugins from any language via rpc and improved architecture right?
580.
by codygman 12y ago
Wow, hledger looks impressive. I think I'll use it as an example for when people ask for a "real world haskell program" as it has a web interface, gui (I think I saw one), is cross platform, and only requires downloading the
581.
by codygman 12y ago
> The most popular language, namely C#, Java and C++ became popular quite quickly. But those languages had corporate backing. Haskell doesn't have corporate backing, so shouldn't you compare it to languages that became popular
582.
by codygman 12y ago
I've used Purescript[0] and thermite[1] (purescript's react bindings): 0: http://www.purescript.org/ 1: https://github.com/paf31/purescript-thermite
583.
How to Sell Excellence (Haskell)(docs.google.com)
3 points by codygman 12y ago|0 comments
584.
by codygman 12y ago
Except it also handles system dependencies as well.
585.
by codygman 12y ago
Maybe this paper[0] on using Applicatives for performance and concurrency in Haskell's Haxl will help. Also note that there is a feature proposal[1] for Applicative Do notation. 0: http://community.haskell.org/~simonmar
586.
by codygman 12y ago
> Once again, types are way overrated. Care to expand on this? I'm curious, what is your opinion and preferred platform/languages?
587.
by codygman 12y ago
Put this in my "watch later" queue. I'm very interested in a Lisp whose type system is on par with that of Haskell/Ocaml. EDIT: Especially since Shen is now BSD licensed.
588.
by codygman 12y ago
> including scotty, actually, which is really cute You know people use Scotty in production right? It's more than cute, though I agree that most Haskell library/framework documentation could use some work. > And there's
589.
by codygman 12y ago
Try using the Scotty inspired Spock[0] with Spock-auth[1] or consider using Snap[2] or Yesod[3]. Here is a Yesod example[4] that uses Auth. Here is a Snap example[5] that uses Auth. > No Node.js tutorial would finish without a working se
590.
by codygman 12y ago
> After playing with Haskell for the last two years, I figured that it would be pretty damn hard to write conventional LAMP/JS webpages in Haskell, but I still wanted to try to solve some of my real world problems with it. Really? Y
591.
by codygman 12y ago
Are you actually going to respond to the fact that you compared Hello world in Ada to something significantly more complex in Haskell? How could you ever think that is a fair comparison?
592.
by codygman 12y ago
The power of a pronoun is a great article, if anything him writing it should be a plus. The only way it is a negative is if you feel gendered pronouns don't further sexism, but I don't see how you could support that argument.
593.
by codygman 12y ago
Cool! How does this compare to the github[0] library? 0: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/github
594.
by codygman 12y ago
> the obvious human resource reasons Can you elaborate on these?
595.
by codygman 12y ago
Wouldn't 10X the most junior developer hourly rate be $200?
596.
by codygman 12y ago
Perhaps I should have mentioned I don't think Scala is the perfect language.
597.
by codygman 12y ago
If you're assertion is correct Scala is close to the perfect language.
598.
by codygman 12y ago
So 2008[0] then? 0: http://book.realworldhaskell.org/
599.
by codygman 12y ago
But there is a compiler flag -XSafe which could guarantee none of your code uses it, meaning GP's answer could be yes.
600.
by codygman 12y ago
> Haskell compile times are "lightning fast" compared to Scala -- wow, maybe OCaml, but Haskell, I mean, seriously, even Haskellers will raise their eyebrows with that claim... As someone who just started using Scala coming fro

More ›