codr7

8 ms·

1. 181.▲
   by codr7 1y ago

   Return customers generate more profit.
2. 182.▲
   by codr7 1y ago

   I couldn't agree more, but we've long since given up our power collectively in hope of escaping responsibility.
3. 183.▲
   by codr7 1y ago

   There's nothing irrational about it, this is how you maximize power and profit at any and all costs.
4. 184.▲
   by codr7 1y ago

   And the conclusions are delusional, especially given how easy it is for anyone to see there is nothing in there even resembling intelligence.
5. 185.▲
   by codr7 1y ago

   I'll take sexprs over CSV/JSON/YAML/XML any day.
6. 186.▲
   by codr7 1y ago

   Except it's all just smoke and mirrors.
7. 187.▲
   by codr7 1y ago

   Humans like games :)
8. 188.▲
   by codr7 1y ago

   I've seen this happen IRL. My former (obviously) wannabe manager used GAI to pimp our CV's before sending out to clients, pretty sure they too consulted stupid to summarize on their end.
9. 189.▲
   by codr7 1y ago

   Totally agree, the best work isn't very visible.
10. 190.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    Maybe they didn't exist. Empty city streets, factories run by children. Where were all the adults?
11. 191.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    I've been working this problem from different angles for a while now: https://github.com/codr7/shi-c https://github.com/codr7/hacktical-c
12. 192.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    Sounds promising but soldering electronics is pretty far outside of my comfort zone, think I'm going to let this marinate for a while.
13. 193.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    Except being special trained to tear humans apart, that is.
14. 194.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    Because the implementation should be familiar to most devs, which makes it easier to see what kind of language you're dealing with. Binary sort would be another candidate for me, but people get it wrong in subtle ways and not every lan
15. 195.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    Because you're using the pre-processor to create a new language, which we have pretty much agreed is a bad idea. If you want that level of safety, why not use a language that provides it for you?
16. 196.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    This is such a nice setup! They can deliver pretty much whatever they feel like. Who can tell a trash token from an hallucination? And tracking token usage is a pita. Sum it up and it translates to: sell whatever you feel like at whatever p
17. 197.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    Too much syntax for me, adding filler words to make it read more like English is a programming language design dead end imo.
18. 198.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    I hereby cast my vote for naive recursive Fibonacci. https://github.com/codr7/shi#language
19. 199.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    Because that level of (type) safety and C is a bad fit.
20. 200.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    From my experience, trying to make C type safe is counter productive. It's perfectly possible to do generic vectors in C without twisting the language. This implementation isn't as safe as alternatives in other languages, but play
21. 201.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    Allocating objects for every single property can turn pretty bad in Java. A strong enough type system would be a lot more useful.
22. 202.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    Sometimes I feel like I actually wouldn't mind having any function touching the database tagged as such. But checked exceptions are such a pita to deal with that I tend to not bother.
23. 203.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    Same goes for almost any other country I've been to. But the US does seem to be one of the worst places from what I see online.
24. 204.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    I'd do this in almost any other language than C :) In C, I like just passing a const char * around as input; this also gives me ability to return progress and unget chars as an added bonus. https://github.com/codr7&#x2F
25. 205.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    Looks overly complicated to me. This is an alternative I wrote for my C book: https://github.com/codr7/hacktical-c/tree/main/task
26. 206.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    From what I've seen, worrying about reactions and resisting the effect, for whatever reasons; which makes you see exactly what you expect and experience the effects stronger. Like many here, I finally managed to fix that by leaning int
27. 207.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    You're not going to leave us hanging with the specs, right?
28. 208.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    Porting my latest educational project[0] to Common Lisp[1]: https://github.com/codr7/shi https://github.com/codr7/shi-cl
29. 209.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    Does it really have to be either or? I get the feeling that spending a lot of time in Rust makes you believe not having that kind of backup is madness. Yet programmers all over the world get by just fine without it. And it's not free b
30. 210.▲
    by codr7 1y ago

    Yep, there's an astonishing amount of pretending involved in dates/time processing, I'm surprised anything works at all just from what I know.