codezero

382 ms·

3841.
by codezero 15y ago
Besides the other links in the comments, you can grab lots of NOAA data here: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/ Of course this isn't as fun as building your own receiver.
3842.
by codezero 15y ago
With all the bad moves HP has made recently, this is a good one. Although my testimony is likely not worth much, I feel it's important to convey why I think HP's PC division is worth keeping around. My boss' HP desktop died, he brought it t
3843.
by codezero 15y ago
Gaining control of the downlink station is pretty bad. I wouldn't say they were in control of the satellites though. The tasking files for satellites are unique and extremely esoteric, and although it's possible for an attacker to figure ou
3844.
by codezero 15y ago
Thanks!
3845.
by codezero 15y ago
Make sure to update the page with the pub you plan to over-flow to. I can't make it at 7:30 but after 9, I will be free.
3846.
by codezero 15y ago
Good point. Thanks for calling me out on that.
3847.
by codezero 15y ago
"this system" wasn't put in place by Obama.
3848.
by codezero 15y ago
Not likely. Anonymous isn't a credible threat to them because they have no authority. Anyone whose name is released by them can just say they are the target of a smear campaign by a group of anonymous internet hackers.
3849.
by codezero 15y ago
What if they put your name on the list? To what authority is Anonymous culpable, and what responsibility do they have to vet the names they release?
3850.
by codezero 15y ago
That would be hilariously ironic, since that's exactly the kind of thing the Church of Scientology does to discredit its detractors.
3851.
by codezero 15y ago
Anonymous isn't putting anyone behind bars, that's the difference. Yes, the "authorities" will take more time, but that's because they have to build a case that will convince a jury and hopefully 1) lock the guys up, or at the very least 2)
3852.
by codezero 15y ago
While I support the vigilante destruction of child porn sites, I do want to point out that in doing so, they may have interrupted an ongoing investigation. Outing the names may embarras the users, but it may also make it harder for authorit
3853.
by codezero 15y ago
A lot of people that fit the profiles described are lurkers. Content consumers, but not creators. That's a pretty common thing on most social networks.
3854.
by codezero 15y ago
Sure, but they could try asking their users rather than peeking through a hole while they shower.
3855.
by codezero 15y ago
Starting a pointless argument on the Internet? Sounds like it's doing a smashing job at mimicking the average Internet user. It could get worse if it uses YouTube comments as a training set!
3856.
by codezero 15y ago
Bethesda should have played Quake.
3857.
by codezero 15y ago
My guess is that this is an advertisement for LCD monitors... the guy went crazy because he's still using a CRT... poor fella.
3858.
by codezero 15y ago
Cool. Sadly, the "updated" graphics look pretty awful. I agree, "classic" mode would be much better.
3859.
by codezero 15y ago
Also, possibly a 1-year old kid who likes to poke and grab things.
3860.
by codezero 15y ago
The notion that they don't compromise is a bit flawed. FaceTime was (is?) WiFi only, for no particular reason except that video streaming is demanding.