codeup

8 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by codeup 16y ago

   Sounds good as a resolution, but sticking to a book may not work for all.
2. 122.▲
   by codeup 16y ago

   There is no single recipe that fits everyone's needs. But it's safe to go step by step, from basic tutorials to coding practice to understanding more complex code. Invest in a good reference book later when you know you will stick to the la
3. 123.▲
   by codeup 16y ago

   Are you trying to pitch RSS against privacy enhancing technologies such as NoScript, TOR, etc.? The point is rather that more privacy is a neat side effect of RSS, not its primary purpose. The primary purpose of RSS - aggregation of content
4. 124.▲
   by codeup 16y ago

   Why should I have to do all that if RSS already exists? There's no reason to accept letting this working technology die. I agree that browsers are unnecessary for RSS though.
5. 125.▲
   by codeup 16y ago

   It wouldn't die if enough people were convinced like the author that it shouldn't die.
6. 126.▲
   by codeup 16y ago

   You can take his concern seriously, RSS autodiscovery in FF is working fine on his page. And that's the feature the author would like to keep in the future.
7. 127.▲
   by codeup 16y ago

   Yes, but too bad Gibson's latest books read as if they're from the past...
8. 128.▲
   by codeup 16y ago

   Disagree. The author clearly refers to corporations like Facebook and Twitter tracking your reading behavior.