coder543

50 ms·

931.
by coder543 4y ago
I created a recovery key no problem. I'm confused about the Security Key for 2FA situation, since I can't find that anywhere on iOS. On the AppleID website, it mentions it, but the "learn more" link 404s[0], and the &quo
932.
by coder543 4y ago
Not really. If you want to link to some useful examples of dimensionally reduced person detection models that exhibit this behavior, then by all means, but none of this is how any current models I've seen work. It also wouldn't ma
933.
by coder543 4y ago
Person detection models draw an outline around each person in frame. What you describe would completely break that, regardless of the model. The model has to keep more of the context or else the bounding rectangles would be all over the
934.
by coder543 4y ago
No, none of this is how ML models work either, unless you're leaving humans in those shirts lying around town. The model would not be trained against "just shirt" == "human". It would just be more samples from the s
935.
by coder543 4y ago
You're being downvoted, but I have no idea why. You're completely correct. Anyone who believes this $71 coat will make them "invisible to AI" doesn't know how machine learning works.
936.
by coder543 4y ago
Once again, cvdazzle seems focused on obscuring a human face, not obscuring the existence of a human, and I don't see how it is more effective than a ski mask. A choice quote from your cvdazzle link: > This face is unrecognizable to
937.
by coder543 4y ago
>>> The original Dazzle camouflage was effective against human eyes too > I'm referring more to the jackets with the dark IR spots. Can your cite your source? Googling for "cvdazzle jacket" turns up nothing. &quot
938.
by coder543 4y ago
This is not doing anything to the edges, and it does not make it harder for me to see the person on the left, at all: https://petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2022/12/cad42d4d39741ca... Additionally, most &q
939.
by coder543 4y ago
> Probably, but perhaps at the expense of a huge increase in false positives. "Perhaps" is a doing a lot of heavy lifting in your comment, and I find the possible outcome you describe to be very unlikely after looking at the
940.
by coder543 4y ago
https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/153379/how-do-you-... I saw it within the past year. I didn’t save a screenshot anywhere I can find. I believe I applied defaults overrides (like in the link) to prevent i
941.
by coder543 4y ago
Just to provide one example, I definitely have seen macOS pop up notifications advertising that Safari is better than everything else, and I should switch back to Safari.
942.
by coder543 4y ago
"corporation" -> "cooperation", but I guess that GPT has seen enough typos to get the gist.
943.
by coder543 4y ago
I was clearly signaling the end of my participation in this subthread.
944.
by coder543 4y ago
It’s a distinction without difference as far as the market is concerned. Your question was just flamebait. If other manufacturers saw how important this would be, and if Apple had zero involvement with the display development as you claim,
945.
by coder543 4y ago
That is a pointless question. Why do you call them Apple iPhones when they’re made by Foxconn? Apple has not made displays in decades, if ever. They still contract the design to meet their specifications, and then market and sell those disp
946.
by coder543 4y ago
It was night and day difference compared to similar 2010 smartphones. Maybe you don’t care about PPI, and that’s fine, but it absolutely did provide benefits to the users in practice.
947.
by coder543 4y ago
Why are you comparing phones from 2015 and 2013 to Apple marketing from 2010? The competition absolutely did catch up eventually. And if the Sharp ISO3 is the best example you can come up with from 2010, then I disagree with your claim enti
948.
by coder543 4y ago
I don't think salaries are the driving factor behind GCP's balance sheet, but that's just my opinion. I obviously can't wave a magic wand and find out for sure either, but my own back of the napkin math can't see th
949.
by coder543 4y ago
No. GCP consistently loses money. One of many sources: https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/27/alphabet_q2_2022/ > Google Cloud brought in $6.3 billion of revenue, a 35 percent year on year increase co
950.
by coder543 4y ago
Once again...[0] at least say "22Ah Phone", but seriously just market the phone on the actual energy capacity , which amp hours are not . This is an "82Wh Phone", assuming they're using a standard lithium ion batt
951.
by coder543 4y ago
yeah, when I tried that link manually earlier, it just redirected to the wiki that the OP linked to. This post should definitely be updated to point to that release notes page, if @dang sees this.
952.
by coder543 4y ago
The wiki still claims 3.4 hasn't released, although the download page has been updated. What's weirder is that past releases have had a easy-to-consume release notes[0], but 3.4 doesn't? Maybe posting it here now is jumping t
953.
by coder543 4y ago
Load characteristics do complicate things as well, but I figured even the optimistic case involved enough batteries to dissuade anyone from this idea. There are other non-rechargeable chemistries that are far more energy dense than AAA batt
954.
by coder543 4y ago
1.9Wh was the number I saw on Google. 10 was just me not thinking clearly late at night. I updated my comment.
955.
by coder543 4y ago
"mAh" is a useless measurement that should be banned from marketing to the public, period. It does not actually represent the energy stored in the batteries, and it can easily mislead people. I also get annoyed that no one uses
956.
by coder543 4y ago
I don't understand why everyone is acting like replacement batteries are unavailable. Here's an amazon link to a variety of options: https://www.amazon.com/CAT-S60-Cell-Phone-Replacement-Batter...
957.
by coder543 4y ago
> Why can't I simply price my app at, for instance, 10? The article says you can. It's one of the "supported conventions".
958.
by coder543 4y ago
Your dedicated servers are by far the most interesting product to me. The US server market needs more price competition, and Hetzner's dedicated servers would bring a lot of competition here if they were priced similarly to how they
959.
by coder543 4y ago
The usefulness of portability is generally less the more it sacrifices performance. I also think of WASM as a tool that could provide a useful security boundary.
960.
by coder543 4y ago
Some interesting holes in that spec: > What to do with leaks out of temporaries? : p = (s1 + s2).c_str(); > pointer/iterator invalidation leading to dangling pointers I feel like those are relatively common memory safety pitfalls

More ›