codekilla

16 ms·

151.
by codekilla 9y ago
Remember, what we are talking about is expressly using the features of quantum theory, superposition, entanglement, etc as a computing resource. This is not at all the same thing as when people say things like 'we design computers with
152.
by codekilla 9y ago
It's true that there is a distinction between a quantum computer build using a universal set of gates(what you probably mean), and one that uses the adiabatic model to carry out computations. The former, is difficult to construct due
153.
by codekilla 9y ago
more people are starting to appreciate that AGIish stuff is actually really, really hard.
154.
by codekilla 9y ago
The simplest quantum algorithm shows an exponential speedup over the best classical solution, this, of course, is the toy example often used in QC texts of determining whether or not a function is constant or balanced(Deutsch). But, as John
155.
by codekilla 9y ago
wow, fox masks....the killer app for AR, can't wait!!
156.
by codekilla 10y ago
Understood. It's true that this type of thing could incur additional expenses and effort, I think though that it is truly worth the effort. It's going to take a push from the top to create a community around the idea, a community
157.
by codekilla 10y ago
I disagree. The most useful replies can be upvoted to deal with noise, and using mathematical formulas to help explain responses is absolutely crucial. I can't tell you how helpful it has been to be looking at an obscure proof, post
158.
by codekilla 10y ago
It would be really, really great if you could somehow hook this up to Discourse so people could comment on and ask questions about the article. Allowing people to ask questions and having others answer like MathOverflow would I think bring