cnity

35 ms·

511.
by cnity 5y ago
This is basically how you'd do it with non-negative matrix factorization. You take the spectrogram of a bunch of known notes for that type of guitar, and store them in a template library (just a vector of vectors, where each inner vect
512.
by cnity 5y ago
I may have to blow the dust off of my prototype.
513.
by cnity 5y ago
The trouble with analysing "notes" in a composition (or even just with a polyphonic instrument) is the pesky harmonics. The timbre of different instruments produce harmonics that happen to be the fundamental frequencies of other n
514.
by cnity 5y ago
That is very kind of you to offer. I don't know if I'd be able to find the time to dedicate to having this function as an actual product though!
515.
by cnity 5y ago
I've worked on this problem for some time on a personal project, and I'm pretty convinced you can basically solve this problem without deep learning or AI techniques, and instead use non-negative matrix factorization[0] as a bank
516.
by cnity 5y ago
To add to all of the beep boop I am a computer person here is a feature table responses, Winamp was just damn fun. The silly llama intro, the skins, that miniature UI with fun EQ. Sure, you _can_ use VLC, or Foobar, but those are just too
517.
by cnity 5y ago
I did not cite reasons of portability for this reason, and generally I agree with you. Also some of the non-portable extensions of Postgres like PostGIS are practically indispensable for certain applications. A more reasonable argument for
518.
by cnity 5y ago
I often move ID generation into the application layer (this also helps avoid things like enumeration attacks), and actually quite a lot of cool Postgres features blur that line a little bit. It's interesting to think sequences and othe
519.
by cnity 5y ago
The key difference is that an opinion is something that can change. A kidnapping cannot be undone. In fact, you have highlighted exactly what I'm getting at. You can tidy a cluttered counter, and will do so if you think it beneficial f
520.
by cnity 5y ago
I don't mean this personally, but I'd like to dive into this take. It is common these days for people to interpret the self-management people perform as a type of filtering (or "hiding" in your words). I find the cynicis
521.
by cnity 5y ago
I want to read the books you are reading.
522.
by cnity 5y ago
Right. They should have called it HIV, which is even shorter!
523.
by cnity 5y ago
Have you considered doing BJJ instead?
524.
by cnity 5y ago
It sparked joy, I like it!
525.
by cnity 5y ago
How long did you spend on the Droste effect on your homepage? :D
526.
by cnity 5y ago
Speak for yourself. It's at least a fantastic sleep aid.
527.
by cnity 5y ago
That depends. Is it too unnatural to go and plant millions of trees? What about culling populations of deer (as we do here in Scotland) to prevent the erosion of forestry (deer love to graze on saplings)? What about the introduction of new
528.
by cnity 5y ago
In a sense, ecological engineering _is_ tech. But trees are the most perfect tool for the job of carbon capture. They don't even require much maintenance!
529.
by cnity 5y ago
I didn't mean it as an attack specifically on the parent comment, sorry if it came across that way. What I mean about the perspective "not interact with the environment anymore" is that many/most people describe the envi
530.
by cnity 5y ago
Can't you just bury the trees?
531.
by cnity 5y ago
In theory, a sink large enough to bring the Earth back to carbon neutral would be possible if the Sahara were reforested[0]: > The team's calculations suggest the forested deserts could draw down around 8bn tonnes of carbon a year,
532.
by cnity 5y ago
> the Earth is greener today than 20 years ago. Do you have a source for this? It sounds like a glimmer of hope I could do with. _Edit:_ Just found this source from Nasa: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/1445
533.
by cnity 5y ago
Almost everything humans do at scale interacts with the environment. The perspective of just not interacting with the environment anymore is a fantasy. We need to learn to wield the environment skillfully, instead of clumsily waving it arou
534.
by cnity 5y ago
Good catch!
535.
by cnity 5y ago
I hadn't thought about the container!
536.
by cnity 5y ago
Remember NYT, write articles that are accurate, never require edits, and hold up infinitely far into the future. That's the job.
537.
by cnity 5y ago
I agree, though I'd settle for: `if (stripe && stripe.handleCardPayment)` (I know the behaviour isn't identical, but checking the actual type is pointless in this case)
538.
by cnity 5y ago
Genuine question: why might it be toxic?
539.
by cnity 5y ago
No, I am taking them on their word.
540.
by cnity 5y ago
You can see the points on your own posts indicated to the left of your name.

More ›