cnbuff410

14 ms·

91.
by cnbuff410 12y ago
Why can't people love Go not because of Google, but the language itself? Don't be deceived by your hate towards any specific company, otherwise you will miss a lot of beautiful, useful, adorable things in this world.
92.
by cnbuff410 12y ago
I use Pure in quite a few projects and I find it simple, fast to use. It's way more light-weight than Bootstrap yet still capable for all of my prototyping demands.
93.
by cnbuff410 12y ago
Just click on his profile and view his comment history. You won't find the examples lacking
94.
by cnbuff410 12y ago
For me, stdlib + some mux library is still the way to go until someday I see the shortcomings. But this is a very classy and admirable way to answer all the critics. He didn't take them offensively at all. Instead he puts more thoughts
95.
by cnbuff410 12y ago
So the more we use this app, the more contribution I can make back into OSM AUTOMATICALLY, is that correct? Hopefully they will release Android version app soon.
96.
Online Learning: A Bachelor's Level Computer Science Program Curriculum(blog.agupieware.com)
128 points by cnbuff410 12y ago|51 comments
97.
by cnbuff410 12y ago
As a Pythoner previously I have big interest in learning Julia and it indeed looks nice. But based on some small project I tried, it didn't show a significantly improved performance vs. Python. On the other hand, it doesn't have a
98.
by cnbuff410 12y ago
Lot's people don't care if language x is "poorly" designed or language y has "perfect" design. They evaluate language using two things: 1 Is it joyful to write without too much cognitive load? 2 Is it getting t
99.
by cnbuff410 12y ago
Very clear. The reduction based scheduling certainly looks interesting. Thanks for your explanation!
100.
by cnbuff410 12y ago
> Erlang chose immutability for safety, while Go chose shared mutable state for practical reasons, but as a remedy Go recommends best practices to avoid the drawbacks caused by it. That's my point. I didn't say it clearly befor
101.
by cnbuff410 12y ago
Is it just me or the author fail to explain all the Go's detrimental design clearly? Most of the points he listed there are pretty much personal taste thing and basically what he was saying is "Go has so many problems because Go i
102.
by cnbuff410 12y ago
Cool project. There are already a couple of Machine Learning libraries[1][2] written in Go and some of them are actually more mature than GoLearn. Also just curious, I always thought Go is not really a good language for DM/ML stuff due
103.
by cnbuff410 12y ago
Complicate deployment is one of the major reason for me to stay away from using Self-hosted Git Server for my small team. This one looks really interesting and promising. Being open source project is another major bonus.
104.
by cnbuff410 13y ago
here is the simplest way to handle it: Just make your whole source code folder(or even your home folder) which contains all your projects to be gopath, and forget about it. Go can live peacefully with any other project.
105.
by cnbuff410 13y ago
Really? "What is it my Mac and iPad are failing to interoperate with"? Can you share your iCloud stuff with others not using Mac system? Marco was blaming Google/Twitter/Facebook locking down devs/users in their own
106.
by cnbuff410 13y ago
Isn't it the same strategy Apple has been played all the time for its OS? And looks like Marco Arment has been enjoying it quite a lot? There is no freedom in terms of interoperability in your daily system and suddenly you are mad at &
107.
by cnbuff410 13y ago
I think we should start to seriously challenge the overhype of "fail fast, failure is fine". Ever since the adoption of "Lean startup" methodology, "failure" suddenly becomes a no big deal to entrepreneur. Making decision is like throwing a