cmxch

14 ms·

241.
by cmxch 1y ago
In turn that opens the possibility of sanctuary cities for aggressively enforcing such cooperation.
242.
by cmxch 1y ago
No, that was the prior administration for using COVID as an opening for tyranny.
243.
by cmxch 1y ago
Only the rich are allowed to be free in congestion zones. All others must bow to the transport and fare schedules.
244.
by cmxch 1y ago
The BlueSky “scientific” community. If they can’t withstand the pressure of actual public interaction, their research isn’t worth legitimizing.
245.
by cmxch 1y ago
So basically the usual BlueSky hugbox refrain.
246.
by cmxch 1y ago
Time to track those paid rioters then.
247.
by cmxch 1y ago
You aren’t wrong. The filtersets are made to aid left leaning causes and to inhibit right leaning ones.
248.
by cmxch 1y ago
And broke it with congestion pricing so that only the few have the freedom to go where transit won’t or doesn’t.
249.
by cmxch 1y ago
Given how Apple makes it maintenance hostile and secures against their end customers, no.
250.
by cmxch 1y ago
They “supported Linux” by putting it in a virtual machine guarded by the hardware against the machine’s owner. No thank you.
251.
by cmxch 1y ago
It’s the grab bag for smears, nothing more.
252.
by cmxch 1y ago
Kind of hard to argue against actual examples of said ideology being implemented.
253.
by cmxch 1y ago
People like curiosity, not vitriol.
254.
by cmxch 1y ago
Unfortunately trying to drop Sinclair stations piecemeal (or otherwise) would break enough markets to attract regulatory attention. One just does not drop ABC from a market and expect nobody to notice.
255.
by cmxch 1y ago
And there goes the remaining customers of Disney. And hopefully their licenses.
256.
by cmxch 1y ago
Federal agents then do same for state authorities for obstructing justice.
257.
by cmxch 1y ago
With policies that essentially make it more expensive to effectively divert offshore. I don’t care how it happens as much as its goal of giving citizens effective first refusal. It might not play well with the infinite guest worker crowd,
258.
by cmxch 1y ago
Or the program requires more teeth to mitigate all adverse citizen impacts.
259.
by cmxch 1y ago
No, destroying the US is what the rampant guest worker abuse is doing.
260.
by cmxch 1y ago
“ Well, more tech talent for India and China it seems.” Not if the US has any way to prevent that.
261.
by cmxch 1y ago
Or you can proceed anyway and accept the damage as a bulwark against circumvention.
262.
by cmxch 1y ago
We don’t.
263.
by cmxch 1y ago
Retrain or pay them until they can replace their lost salary, contingents and contractors broadly included.
264.
by cmxch 1y ago
The trouble is that also gives a period to understand how to circumvent the law or capture the regulation.
265.
by cmxch 1y ago
Fix that, and give the limits more teeth. While not ideal, I don’t see the guest worker programs being a good thing unless the affected firms experience (and cannot escape or mitigate) a certain fiscal pain, especially if it involves revenu
266.
by cmxch 1y ago
Then make the GCC itself unprofitable to operate as an extractive force and the costs unable to be mitigated as an extractive entity. Your GCCs will be paying for the direct training of the US side people you overlooked and essentially a ge
267.
by cmxch 1y ago
Set a floor that is regionally adjusted such that the foreign ops/noncitizen cost is consistently higher no matter where. And that it also accounts for and penalizes malicious compliance/intent. Regarding the overall problem: For
268.
by cmxch 1y ago
Just rip out the entire 1965 Immigration Act root and stem along with its follow on provisions. Then replace with a points system with citizen impact factored into the equation. To handle the losses, have any firm and their downstream contr
269.
by cmxch 1y ago
You mean the part where former HP exec Carly Fiorina said “Forget the engineers”?
270.
by cmxch 1y ago
Those are not H1-Bs.

More ›