Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cmsj
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
211.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
Buildzoid on YouTube has a very good response to this - he does not agree that the fault is the (still terrible) wires at the back of the connector. His reasoning is that the melting is happening down at the pin end of the connector, not at
212.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
what are the exercise applications? Isn't exercise a thing where your form matters, so you need to be able to see your own body?
213.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
No, not really, because while nobody enjoyed the pre-iPhone smartphone experience, it was obviously useful and there was adoption - think Blackberry. VR though... it's really hard to imagine use cases that will cause a billion people
214.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
Not sure that hurts Google anywhere near as much as it does Facebook?
215.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
If you're writing Ansible playbooks with YAML then you are using it as a declarative programming language. So YAML can be a programming language.
216.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
I'll start by repeating that the serverless part of my comment was me extending the things that other people are predicting for the future. I'm not 100% I agree, but I'll continue their position: containers are only really be
217.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
Compare https://www.stackalytics.io/?metric=commits&release=folsom from 10 years ago with https://www.stackalytics.io/?metric=commits&release=zed from this month. Notice that 2012's Folsom rele
218.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
Absolutely the same here. WhatsApp is a nightmare to use without contacts, but I don't care, they are not having my contacts.
219.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
Yeah for sure. Lion could well be 10x more delicious than beef for all I know, but I'm quite certain we couldn't farm millions of lions.
220.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
> "billions who subsist on seafood will now have to eat eggs, pork, beef" There is another possible outcome... :/
221.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
Maybe it was the crab rapture?
222.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
Yay! I built an IRC bot for SD using lstein's repo because it was the first one that I could get to work reliably on M1, so I'm really glad to see the process continue really well with InvokeAI!
223.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
A decade of CVE coverage for all of universe? Colour me skeptical that they can actually pull that off.
224.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
there's also something inherently compelling about the outsider who gets something more right than the experts.
225.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
If anyone wants to save themselves the trouble of reading that, the summary is: Complex systems are chaotic and unlikely to be systematically good or evil; herds don't have a leader (the bus driver in the title's analogy); make yo
226.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
Always leave the audience wanting more.
227.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
> Most JavaScript-based single-page applications from 2010 should still run flawlessly in modern browsers. If they're purely client-side, sure, but there's a good chance that anything we could reasonably call a web application,
228.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
If communities are formed with the sole purpose of being a haven for horrible people to further radicalise each other, it's perfectly reasonable for society's antibodies to destroy those communities.
229.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
No need to be rude.
230.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
> Apple has quietly positioned itself to dominate the online advertising market of the 2020s Bit of a stretch unless/until Apple gets into ads outside the App Store.
231.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
If our goal is truly to work towards Level 5 autonomy, then by definition most accidents couldn't involve human error other than a person hurling themselves in front of such a vehicle.
232.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
I don't think the answer is to not allow autonomous cars to be sold, I think the answer is to engineer self-driving cars with the same kind of rigour that the aircraft industry uses, rather than the kind of rigour that startups use.
233.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
We accept that human drivers are not perfect and are going to cause thousands of deaths per year with their vehicles. It's a whole different ballgame to accept that computers are going to choose to kill thousands of people per year, an
234.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
The question was not really a quantitative one. The purpose of asking that question is to determine the mindset of the person answering. Safety systems don't generally get built with an MVP mindset, but that seems to be what is happeni
235.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
I'd like to invite you to consider that with the (I would say) utilitarian view that one less death is an acceptable MVP, you are implicitly saying that you'd be ok with products being sold in the full knowledge that they would au
236.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
> seems all too comfortable ignoring the other crashes that happen daily In your view, what is the MVP for self-driving car safety, in terms of the number of crashes/deaths per day?
237.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
Level 2 is the equivalent of Tesla's Autopilot. The driver is not always in control, but they must always be monitoring and be ready to immediately assume control. (In many ways, L2 is just about the dumbest imaginable level of automat
238.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
> Innocents being injured or killed while testing this tech is more akin to a negligent murder via technology than an "accident". I'd like to see us treat autonomous road safety the way we treat aircraft safety, where even
239.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
> What I do care is what the laws actually are I note that you're not quoting the relevant legal definitions though.
240.
▲
by
cmsj
4y ago
I feel like this is often how these discussions go - crypto maximalists say this is going to change the world and take over all sorts of things, someone suggests that it actually wouldn't make any difference for most things, and they s
More ›