Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cm2187
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
25 ms
·
241.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
My point was rather that officers should have better things to do than feed the bureaucracy with reports no one will ever read, and so the harder you make it to write reports, the less likely they will do more of them!
242.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
And now that everything is a package, it won’t get fixed with windows update. Which means that if the website isn’t actively developed and regularly deployed, it will remain vulnerable
243.
▲
Amazon to Lay Off Tens of Thousands of Corporate Workers
(wsj.com)
17 points
by
cm2187
1y ago
|
1 comments
244.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
On the photos everyone looks busy, but I presume that the guys spent 30 years sitting in front of screens where nothing happen, except perhaps once every 3 months.
245.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
That's not what dfawcus is saying, he is talking about installed capacity, not consumption. If you build 1GW of wind, you need to also build 1GW of gas to make up for when there is no wind (and as you can tell from gridwatch, it's
246.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
You are not going to observe that in annual averages. As mentioned in my other comment, you can observe that very clearly in the energy production charts: https://gridwatch.co.uk/
247.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
But also europe isn't that large. When there is no wind in the UK, there is no wind in France or Italy. Which means not only do they not provide diversification, they will import at the same time.
248.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
you can actually see it live here: https://gridwatch.co.uk/ It illustrates both the volatility of wind (which regularly goes to zero for at least a week), and how it is currently pretty much 100% offset with gas.
249.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
The batteries mentioned in the article have only a few hours of capacity, and are designed to smooth the peak usage intraday. I think many people are confused and seem to think batteries are a viable way to address the volatility of wind, w
250.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
Also I fail to see the distinction between an ESTA/ETIAS and a visa. If I need to apply ahead of travelling, and pay a fee, and this may be denied, how is that not a visa?
251.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
Retention is offline retention. Not online. So not sure what point you are trying to make. If it is that SSDs shouldn't be used for cold storage, yeah I agree, and enterprise SSds aren't designed for cold storage. But you seem to
252.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
Agree on SSD for cold storage, that's not a good idea. But you would be surprised by how little used are typical used enterprise SSDs on ebay. This article matches my experience: https://www.servethehome.com/we-bought-1
253.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
Might be a bit adventurous for primary storage (though with enough backup and redundancy, why not). But seems perfect for me for backup / cold storage.
254.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
You can find cheap used enterprise SSDs on ebay. But the problem is that even the most power efficient enterprise SSD (SATA) idle at like 1w. And given the smaller capacities, you need many more to match a hard drive. In the end HDD might a
255.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
Agree, you should consider replacing your drives on your primary server (backup servers we can debate) as soon as you start seeing the first SMART problems, like bad sectors. If you do regular data scrubbing, and none of these problems show
256.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
In fact I find the synology disk trays to be very fragile. Out of the 48 trays I have, I think a good 6 or 7 do not close anymore unless you lock them with a key. A common problem apparently.
257.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
I don’t know if their brand is that great. I have been using synology NAS for about 15 years. It is very solid and easy to use, but the hardware is expensive, non customizable, the underlying OS is based on an ancient linux kernel. I have n
258.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
Hum, how much of the success of azure is due to enterprise customers being in the windows ecosystem already? And what happens when the next enterprises are not?
259.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
If you make the system idiot proof, they will just build better idiots...
260.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
Or investigations into a major financial scandal in a large French bank! (While the Credit Lyonnais was investigated in the 90s, both the HQ and the site where they stored their archives were destroyed by fire within a few months)
261.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
Plus long distance was mostly fibre already. And even regular electrical wires aren’t really much slower than fibre in term of latency. Parent probably meant bandwidth.
262.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
Yeah, but I don't think Reuters, AP or AFP are anywhere near the top 1000 most popular accounts on tiktok. So they can sign anything they want, won't affect the average tiktok user.
263.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
By the time the video reaches the end user (i.e. on tiktok and the likes), it will have been re-compressed, edited, meme-ed, voiced over a dozen time. So not sure how you preserve trust in that chain.
264.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
Is it? Requiring consensus to pass laws at the federal level, that are binding on the states, doesn't look like a terrible thing to me.
265.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
not sure what that tells you exactly. Preference for what, monetary policy as opposed to commerce?
266.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
Well, not quite third-hand, the guy was working in my team. But not a US company, not in the US either though.
267.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
I know a story of a guy who got fired for just talking to the CEO of his large company!
268.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
I am looking on the web and it seems to be indeed the case. It also seems UK tankers can't even fuel UK F-35, which is a bit lame.
269.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
That surprises me, I thought all NATO planes were interoperable. Israel isn't part of NATO but their systems are mostly sold by NATO countries. US jets can't use UK tankers?
270.
▲
by
cm2187
1y ago
I am not trying to defend it, but I understand the issue was that the order was unclear.
More ›