Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
closed
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
271.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
I started learning Cantonese recently, and the thing that struck me is how insane it is just to get started. Half of my books use Yale romanization, but others use jyutping, so I had to pick up both. Add to that that written Cantonese is Ma
272.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
Sorry for the late reply. stringr does a pretty good job (though I like how python handles strings better).
273.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
As a person who deeply enjoys developing with python, I'd have to reluctantly say R's tidyverse is a delight to use and often faster than pandas in my experience.
274.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
Thanks for the pointers, I'll definitely have to take another look at trinket.io! It would be cool to try some exercise submission + feedback with code highlighting all on the client side.
275.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
I work as an engineer at https://datacamp.com , and we run the code directly on a server, but I've always thought it would be interesting to try building interactive programming exercises with Skulpt.
276.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
Hmm.. good point. It'd be interesting to think of examples where something with a "complex border" turned out true, and examples where it turned out false. (On a side not, I love this kind of scientific approach to believing
277.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
Probably the Idirans
278.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
In my experience, most the time people use binning, it's straightforward to demonstrate that their binning+model is equivalent to restricted forms of more general models (e.g. common general additive / structural equation model).
279.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
I don't know if they're bad at higher abstractions, or if the pay-off of a higher abstraction isn't always there (or is unclear). The original comment did a good job of illustrating this. It's not clear from this post wh
280.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
Wow, this really struck home the idea of useful forms of generality for me. Definitely reminded me of an interesting section in Polya's book Induction and Analogy in Mathematics that discusses different forms of generality, and when i
281.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
This article is built around an error in statistical inference. The author uses aggregate data to fit a linear model, then erroneously supposes the slope can be applied to data at the individual level. It can't. For example, there are
282.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
Or because of the acute pain of losing be more likely to tell their story. I guess whichever side gets this wrong is exhibiting survivorship bias bias.
283.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
Agreed. It seems like side projects for work are basically research (and research is important!).
284.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
It seems like early PhD work often involves working at a critical piece that's often overlooked: learning the social landscape of academics (and maybe figuring out what kind of academic they want to be).
285.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
Could you elaborate? I'm particularly interested in the matter of life or death bit :).
286.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
> And I don't need to call an account rep if I need to extend functionality. Thank you for reminding that this special kind of hell exists.
287.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
For context, I'm pretty sure all of Princeton's grad students are funded (including masters of public administration). Still cool, just wanted to put it out there in case anyone was wondering what their CS dept is up to.
288.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
As a memory researcher, I'm a bit puzzled by their criticism that for different learning approaches, few studies qualified for studying long term memory (where long term is defined as 2 years). If there is a difference in retention bet
289.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
If one variant beats another, even with very few observations, the data DOES support that one is better. It's just that you might not be very confident that one is better. The key to understanding this situation statistically is by ref
290.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
If you are waiting for N observations, so that a NHST will have some level of power, and you assume each observations is drawn from the same distribution (as your test likely does), then you do not see each observation as noise. You will ju
291.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
Interesting article! I worked with complex span tasks in grad school, and just had people silence their phones :(. I wonder how many reaches participants made toward their phones when they were in their desk or pocket (even if they were off
292.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
I disagree, if a person has to make a decision under uncertainty, and a priori favors neither group A or B, then they might as well use any visitor information available to them to guide their choice. They just shouldn't be too confide
293.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
I like reading fiction before bed, but the end result is me forming a makeshift blanket cave for 3 hours while my partner snoozes. :o
294.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
By your advisor? I'm surprised, because most fields have standards for citing posters, websites, and misc digital media, which are not peer reviewed.
295.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
At first I was confused, because statistical models that aren't temporally independent are very common. But it's very clear from the comments that having dice that aren't independent between rolls is incredibly in demand :o,
296.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
Interestingly, one of my old colleagues has research that examines exercise / sport practice in humans as an alternative to the WM training approach. (You two might get along :). https://scholar.google.com/citations?use
297.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
That was half the claim. The full claim was that it improves fluid intelligence by improving working memory. The title of Jaeggi 2008 is "Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory". http://www.pnas.
298.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
Slightly off-topic, but the pushback against brain training owes a huge debt of thanks to Randy Engle (and others), for loudly questioning the methods and rational of the early "become smarter by the magic of dual n-back" research
299.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
Good point, in essence it sounds like one theory people have is that competition winners have over-specialized, but your theory is that there could be floor effects in the range of ability at Google (i.e. the floor is high, many people at G
300.
▲
by
closed
9y ago
this looks like it does what you're mentioning (R lib wrapping js): https://github.com/seifer08ms/Rmarkmap
More ›