claiir

5 ms·

31.
by claiir 8mo ago
And Gemini 3 can’t..? Isn’t this just a thinking vs nonthinking model thing?
32.
by claiir 8mo ago
This part is interesting: > [verify to] Speak in a stage channel. My understanding is non-stage voice channels are E2E encrypted, and Discord retains no recordings, whereas stage channels are not. Is this a liability thing—Discord not wa
33.
by claiir 11mo ago
Javascript doesn’t generally execute on your GPU.
34.
by claiir 1y ago
> Asked by CNN's Kaitlan Collins why previous editions of the National Climate Assessment were no longer available online, former fracking company CEO Wright responded [..] lol
35.
by claiir 1y ago
Maybe just have commands auto-execute if you click on links in the existing text? That would allow someone to experience the entire interface on a touch device! :> E.g. there is **__contact__** in the page, bold and underlined, but you c
36.
by claiir 1y ago
Sounds like the LLM you used when writing this slop comment struggled with the problem too. :>
37.
by claiir 1y ago
Same experience with my personal benchmarks. Generally unimpressed with Qwen3.
38.
by claiir 1y ago
o1-preview had this same issue too! You’d give it a long conversation to summarize, and if the conversation ended with a question, o1-preview would answer that, completely ignoring your instructions. Generally unimpressed with Qwen3 from my
39.
by claiir 1y ago
Likely not the case, given (1) the body was peri-mortem decapitated (by a human) and (2) apparent structural damage was limited to a single bite mark (on the ilium), with no signs of "taphonomic" damage (indicating limited soft ti
40.
by claiir 1y ago
Actual paper: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal...
41.
by claiir 1y ago
> GoDaddy is actively experimenting to integrate image generation so customers can easily create logos that are editable [..] I remember meeting someone on Discord 1-2 years ago (?) working on a GoDaddy effort to have customer-generated
42.
by claiir 1y ago
Okay, but why did `LeaveCriticalSection` change? Compiler changes, new features, refactoring, etc? That’s the most interesting part (and absent)!
43.
by claiir 1y ago
It’s not just you. The speedup is an artefact of the CFG (Classifier-Free Guidance) the model uses. The other problem is the speedup isn’t constant—it actually accelerates as the generation progresses. The Parakeet paper [1] (which OP lifte
44.
by claiir 1y ago
Yea they mention a “perplexity drop” relative to naive quantization, but that’s meaningless to me. > We reduce the perplexity drop by 54% (using llama.cpp perplexity evaluation) when quantizing down to Q4_0. Wish they showed benchmarks &
45.
by claiir 2y ago
In this case it's a little bit worse; the "nate" app had a literally " 0% automation rate," despite representations to investors of an "AI" automation rate of "93-97%" powered by "LSTMs, NL
46.
by claiir 2y ago
Actual indictment: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/media/1396131/dl?inline
47.
by claiir 2y ago
* Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. Be charitable. I provided encyclopedic reference out of a mutual discovery interest. Magaz
48.
by claiir 2y ago
The fundamental precept here is that foreign investment of goods is more preferable to domestic investment of goods [1], so running a negative trade balance is dispreferable. Trump is a textbook Mercantilist (positive trade balance inherent
49.
by claiir 2y ago
Long-term trade deficits are intrinsically bad. The tariffs directly address this by being exactly weighed by said deficit. See the OTR report [1]: > To conceptualize reciprocal tariffs, the tariff rates that would drive bilateral trade
50.
by claiir 2y ago
In the long-term. Hence "innoculation"--a prick today to prevent a serious illness tomorrow. In the grand scheme of things, the market movement we saw in response to these tariffs is dwarfed by the sustained market downturn throug
51.
by claiir 2y ago
Correct; it doesn't. However, (1) Tariffs will not affect all commodities in the same class equally, creating a natural price advantage, even at the level of consumers. While not absolute autarky, demand will continue to shift to less
52.
by claiir 2y ago
Original clip is here [1]. This likely isn't real, though if ChatGPT were used, I suppose it worked out this time :> [1]: https://www.tiktok.com/@destinygnome/video/74891340165247337...
53.
by claiir 2y ago
Thanks for the question. Three reasons: (1) Much like a carbon tax, when the economy becomes accountable for an externality (risk in this case, rather than carbon) it is priced in at every level, ending with consumers, whose demand is price
54.
by claiir 2y ago
I am in the minority here. These tariffs are fairly reasonable. Here's why: (1) The state has a compelling interest in regulating market risk tolerance. When the FED sets the risk-free interest rate, it controls the price of risk, and
55.
by claiir 2y ago
(2) is also significantly harder with these new models as they don’t support word timestamps like WHISPR. see > Other parameters, such as timestamp_granularities, require verbose_json output and are therefore only available when using wh
56.
by claiir 2y ago
Hi Jeff. This is awesome. Any plans to add word timestamps to the new speech-to-text models, though? > Other parameters, such as timestamp_granularities, require verbose_json output and are therefore only available when using whisper-1.
57.
by claiir 2y ago
Even worse: proponents of the Neural Efficiency Hypothesis[1] might interpret the "mean brain activation" values reported in the study[2] in the exact opposite manner. :) [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neu
58.
by claiir 2y ago
"Study [..] found that the drug can reduce brain function" Causal language in news on correlational (case-control) studies should be a crime. This is a brazen misrepresentation of the results. The direction of the causal arrow (ca
59.
by claiir 2y ago
"mogged" in an actual piece of journalism... perhaps fitting > DeepSeek undercut or “mogged” OpenAI by connecting this powerful reasoning [..]
60.
by claiir 2y ago
Carvana stock didn’t seem to react much at all to that Jan 2 report (higher today than on Jan 1, even)? I wonder if, and possibly how much, Hindenburg lost on that trade.

More ›