cjonas

12 ms·

121.
by cjonas 1y ago
Given their relationship with AWS, I wonder if this feature just runs the agent core code interpreter behind the scenes.
122.
by cjonas 1y ago
What does having an "uneasy disapproving feeling" actually solve?
123.
by cjonas 1y ago
Once thing I've noticed is the difference in code quality by language. I'm constantly disappointed by the output of python code. I have to correct it to follow even the most basic software development principles (DRY, etc). Types
124.
by cjonas 1y ago
Ya, I didn't mean in the context of hooking up a LLM to control your browser (which is exactly what the article is about so, fair enough). My point was: It's not "insecure" for a bank to release an agentic assistant that
125.
by cjonas 1y ago
I'll also add the problem in the article seems pretty solvable by allowing user to scope the agentic capabilities to specific websites ( eg "walmart.com:allow_cc,allow_adress").
126.
by cjonas 1y ago
If you only give the AI the ability to do what the end user can already do, the risk is extremely low. It's essential no different then building a static web app where the client is connected to API for all operations. It basically j
127.
by cjonas 1y ago
There should be legislation that requires company's allow "opting out" of individualized algorithmic feeds. I'm fine if you want to show me videos similar to channels I've explicitly subscribed to. But tracking my
128.
by cjonas 1y ago
As others have said, the permissions required to make this work are scary and require a lot of trust. The fact YouTube and Instagram don't allow you to disable endless algorithmic short form content is straight up evil.
129.
by cjonas 1y ago
Oh absolutely. To be clear... I think this is probably a bad idea. It probably wouldn't be successful and if it was you'd have very little control of how it evolves.
130.
by cjonas 1y ago
The problem with LLMs reaching true AGI is it's basically "static" intelligence. Changing code, context, prompts and even fine tuning can improve output, but is still far from realtime learning. The "weights" in our
131.
by cjonas 1y ago
Ya, I don't need my todo list to have "docs" at all.
132.
by cjonas 1y ago
My guess is leaked from a misconfigured force.com site often used as a support portal or kb. Up until recently they came misconfigured by default to allow public access to the basic info of accounts, contact, opportunity through list view e
133.
by cjonas 1y ago
Doesn't perplexity crawl to harvest and index data like a traditional search engine? Or is it all "on demand"?
134.
by cjonas 1y ago
Like for people or are using a ad block or for a crawler downloading your content so it can be used by an AI response?
135.
by cjonas 1y ago
Pretty sure this is a joke/demo for the power of type scripts typing system
136.
by cjonas 1y ago
Can you explain what I'm looking at. Just appears to be a massive readme with a bunch of system instructions?
137.
by cjonas 1y ago
Then do you need tests to validate your tests are correct, otherwise the LLM might just generate passing code even if the test is bad? Or write code that games the system because it's easier to hardcode an output value then to do the
138.
by cjonas 1y ago
Ya this is nonsense. The web is what it is. You could maybe say "every framework is a hack to workaround protocols primarily designed in the 90's before we really understood the full application of the web"
139.
by cjonas 1y ago
Why mention multiboard and not honeycomb storage wall (HSW)? It's open source and arguably a better ecosystem.
140.
by cjonas 1y ago
The only production experience I have with logic programming is OPA Rego for writing security policies (not sure it's a "pure" logic language but feels like the primary paradigm). I found it pretty interesting for that use ca
141.
by cjonas 1y ago
Are there any guides on using the "react style" framework (JSX / State) to generate outputs other than DOM? I've been interested in the idea of doing something similar for JSON or markdown document generation.
142.
by cjonas 1y ago
Just to clarify, you'd write the bottom code (declarative) and the library translates it to the above (imperative) code?
143.
by cjonas 1y ago
> You still have to deal with all the tooling you are talking about, right? You’ve just moved the goalpost to the BE This. From a security perspective, server side dependencies are way more dangerous than client side.
144.
by cjonas 1y ago
It totally depends on the use case. As a consultant the majority of my work is around business process automation and integrating cloud systems. We build a lot of small "applications" that change almost constantly. The number of
145.
by cjonas 1y ago
I've really enjoyed typebox. Any reason to check out zod v4?
146.
by cjonas 2y ago
My only experience is via cursor but I'd agree in that context 3.7 is worse than 3.5. 3.7 goes crazy trying to fix any little linter errors and often gets confused and will just hammer away, making things worse until I stop generation.
147.
by cjonas 2y ago
Calling typescript devs "low quality" while also citing python as "high quality" actually made me laugh out loud. Thank you for the chuckle.
148.
by cjonas 2y ago
I had this same observation a few weeks ago. Salesforce has been pushing hard for orgs to migrate from their shotty programming language (apex) to their visual programming language (Flow). My observation was that apex is better positioned t
149.
by cjonas 2y ago
Ya I think the past it felt as if the US was sharing in a global recession. This time it feels self inflicted and US Hegemony may be a thing of the past. If the dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency, I'm not sure how
150.
by cjonas 2y ago
Guaranteed eventual enshitification?

More ›