cjhopman

34 ms·

331.
by cjhopman 9y ago
This is exactly why I dig up the bodies of influential historical figures every chance I get.
332.
by cjhopman 10y ago
I think that's an incorrect interpretation of what he said. He does not say there has never been an accusation, he says there has never _before_ been an accusation.
333.
by cjhopman 10y ago
If 99.9% of software installed outside of the chrome web store were installed by adware would you feel differently? Your black and white view of the world bores me.
334.
by cjhopman 10y ago
You don't have to feel discriminated against to be discriminated against. Corporations (and individual people) should pay for minor abuses against large groups (typically people already pay for large abuses against minor groups).
335.
by cjhopman 10y ago
Why would you want to eat at a restaurant that discriminates against you anyway? Why would you want to go to a school that discriminates against you anyway? Why would you want to ride a bus that discriminates against you anyway?
336.
by cjhopman 11y ago
Unlikely. Unless a single function corresponds to a possibly infinite set of nodes, most programs are not trees.
337.
by cjhopman 11y ago
I actually think the model 3 looks fine. I've seen several model x driving around and their nose is really hideous. The model s has just like a black section that looks normal and fine. The model 3 has done completely away with the bla
338.
by cjhopman 11y ago
Oh please. If google wanted to record from Chrome users, they could do it easily. If you actually trust packagers to know what Chrome is doing, you're crazy.
339.
by cjhopman 11y ago
If you read the linked paper, this vulnerability is not limited to offline transactions. Edit: clarification, there are sort of three types of transactions-- offline - vulnerable to this (and a simpler attack) online w/ offline p
340.
by cjhopman 11y ago
Those are both types of lithium ion batteries.
341.
by cjhopman 11y ago
It seems that the author assumes that readers uderstand that the comparison is between the described lives/jobs with ones in the past where it was basically you never see your family (or, more likely, you don't have one).
342.
by cjhopman 12y ago
I don't think that that's correct. The plan page basically says that it's by-the-100MB pricing. https://fi.google.com/about/plan/
343.
by cjhopman 12y ago
It is that high. http://www.nyc.gov/html/omb/downloads/pdf/tech2_15.pdf
344.
by cjhopman 12y ago
Vanguard institutional plus is 0.02%
345.
by cjhopman 12y ago
The number of nodes in your tree is countable. The number of paths in your tree is uncountable. In the infinitely subdivided pixel case, a node in the tree corresponds to an x,y position at a particular depth (or, even better, the set of pi
346.
by cjhopman 12y ago
If there are countably many rounds of division, then there is a vertical (and horizontal) "division" for each path (from the root) in an infinite complete binary tree. The number of paths in an infinite complete binary tree is unc
347.
by cjhopman 12y ago
I find that incredibly unlikely. Do you have a source?
348.
by cjhopman 13y ago
And, according to your edit, you missed my point. That blog post explicitly states that Chromium has many of the same "phone-home features" of Chrome. That includes the specific one discussed in this thread, "search suggest&q
349.
by cjhopman 13y ago
Who's "they"? http://blog.chromium.org/2008/10/google-chrome-chromium-and-...
350.
by cjhopman 13y ago
So there was a way for any random app to play whatever video it wanted on my tv? And Google disabled it? Well gee, shame on them.
351.
by cjhopman 13y ago
Do you find that you often have to manually fix gmail's incorrect assumptions about what mail you consider spam?
352.
by cjhopman 13y ago
My understanding is not that they have good evidence that there is CP on the encrypted drive, but rather that they have good evidence that the drive belongs to the guy and that he can decrypt it/has access to/knowledge of its contents. The
353.
by cjhopman 14y ago
I don't think what you've said is precisely true... a b(c x); can be syntactically correct even if c is not a type. Trivially, any of the four tokens could be preprocessor definitions. Even if we are talking about preprocessed c++,
354.
by cjhopman 14y ago
In fact, such a use of "while" is supported by both Fowler's Modern English and the Oxford English Dictionary (and others).
355.
by cjhopman 14y ago
That's incorrect. The first sale doctrine has no such restriction on lending.
356.
by cjhopman 14y ago
My guess is that he accidentally posted it internally first and then posted it externally. And so, both times he posted it, he meant to post it externally.
357.
by cjhopman 15y ago
Hm, you removed important grammatical structure... "Not interested in [x, y, z, just a, b, or] anything involving physical products"
358.
by cjhopman 15y ago
If you're going to be a smart-ass, then go all out. function jsChallenge() { function sum(n) { var k = Math.floor(1000 / n); return n * k * (k + 1) / 2; }; return sum(1) - sum(5) - sum(7) + sum(35); }
359.
by cjhopman 15y ago
Really? I think that transcript essentially proves that it wasn't Google. Everything he says about the program is completely wrong. I'll just pick out the things that are indisputably wrong, there is more that I would argue is wrong but may